
#1
Jan3013, 05:04 PM

P: 4

Hello hello, I'm not looking just for an answer per say, but am also wondering the thought process in solving problems such as the following:
Hopefully this doesn't take up too much of someones time. Determine whether the following equations are logically equivalent: 1) (∃x)( P(x) → Q(x) ) 2) (∀x)P(x) → (∃x)Q(x) 



#3
Jan3113, 01:09 AM

P: 497

After you have followed micromass's suggestion, the next step can make more sense to you if you contemplate an analogy (I stress that this is a way of thinking: it would not work as a formal proof)
all quantifier like a large "and", existence quantifier like a large "or" "and" like "intersection" "or" like "union" deMorgan Laws. Formally, if you are not an intuitionist, you can try playing around with the equivalence between "[itex]\forall[/itex]x P" and "~[itex]\exists[/itex]x ~P", or between "[itex]\exists[/itex]x Q" and "~[itex]\forall[/itex]x ~Q" (by the way, it's "per se") 



#4
Jan3113, 02:10 PM

P: 31

Testing Logical Equivalence
If you are familiar with how to determine a formula is logically true, then you can use the fact that formulas are logically equivalent just in case their biconditional is logically true. If there is an interpretation that makes the biconditional of (1) and (2) false, then they are not logically equivalent. If there is no such interpretation, then they are logically equivalent.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
showing logical equivalence  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Simplifying a logical equivalence statement without a truth table  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  1  
logical equivalence of statements with truth tables  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4  
logical equivalence, need mad help.  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  1  
Logical Equivalence HELP!  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  1 