Register to reply 
Hawking radiation and Black hole evaportion 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb313, 11:58 AM

P: 4

When the 'evaporation' of a black hole supposedly occurs, it is always attributed to 'Hawking radiation.' As I understand it, Hawking radiation occurs when a virtual particle pair is 'split' at the exact edge of an event horizon. When this occurs, one of the particle pair escapes to 'normal' spacetime, while the other is pulled down into the hole. When this occurs, it is logical to assume that the black hole actually gains a very small amount of matter (the doomed companion of the free particle). As I understand 'evaporation,' it occurs when a portion of a 'thing' or condition actually yields part of its being or totality. With Hawking radiation, this is not actually happening, since the Black hole/singularity is not giving anything of its 'self' but is actually gaining (the sad particle of the pair). How can we speak of the black hole evaporating when in fact it is 'gaining' matter during Hawking radiation?



#2
Feb313, 12:07 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160




#3
Feb313, 12:24 PM

P: 4

Thanks. So would it be accurate to assume that the antiparticle is the pair partner that is always caught in the gravity well of the black hole, thereby diminishing the mass of the singularity?



#4
Feb313, 12:27 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

Hawking radiation and Black hole evaportion
That's correct. Of course the term "anti" is used here in a relative sense. It can just as well be the antiparticle that escapes and the normal particle that falls in.



#5
Feb313, 01:02 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 5,436

It's rather difficult: afaics Hawking's interpretation (particleantiparticle pairs, virtual particles) cannot be derived from his (brilliant) calculation. There is no particleantiparticle pair, and there is no oneloop integral, therefore no virtual particles (in the sense of the formalism).
Nevertheless Hawking's interpretation became standard. 


#6
Feb313, 01:03 PM

PF Gold
P: 6,274

Also, as I understand it from posts on this forum, there is some confusion around the actual operation of Hawking radiation and at least one post here said that Hawking himself said that the "virtual particle pair" is just a conceptual device to describe something that is a bit more complex than that. EDIT: apparently it's another one of those cases where the math doesn't really translate well into English. 


#7
Feb313, 03:40 PM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 6,126

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...s/hawking.html It says that nobody has ever worked out a local description of how Hawking radiation is generated that corresponds to the "virtual particle pair" description, and describes in a bit more detail how the actual computations are done. 


#8
Feb313, 05:20 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 5,436

I have to find a paper which does not use virtual particles but at least tunneling.



#9
Feb413, 12:29 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 8,520




#10
Feb413, 12:43 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 5,436

Yes, there are real particles, but their properties depend on the spacetime background; in some sense Hawking radiation is like distorted wave approximation; the interpretation of a mode depends where you look at it (Hawking radiation is studied at nullinfinity and cannot be 'localized' at the horizon); the interpretation uses nothing else but free particles described by distorted waves, no interaction, no higher order, ... is used.
I recommend to study Hawking's original paper: http://www.itp.unihannover.de/~giul...g_CMP_1975.pdf The idea is very simpe, the math is not very complicated. The main problem is that math and its interpretation start to deviate already in this paper! That's why I don't like Hawking's popular books; he doesn't care much for exactness when he starts to spin a yarn. 


#11
Feb413, 06:08 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160




#12
Feb413, 01:46 PM

P: 5,632

Descriptions I have seen:
posted above: it is not possible to localize a particle to within one wavelength, virtual particle separation, tunneling and another from Leonard Susskind: pieces of long strings break off from the stretched horizon due to quantum fluctuations...and appear as real particles...... from his book THE BLACK HOLE WAR. 


#13
Feb413, 05:56 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 5,436




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Hawking radiation , black hole size  General Physics  15  
Hawking Radiation inside a Black Hole?  Special & General Relativity  12  
Hawking radiation from a black hole?  Cosmology  2  
Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Evaporation  Quantum Physics  0  
Hawking radiation and black hole formation  General Physics  2 