Supernova remnants & neutron star


by shounakbhatta
Tags: neutron, remnants, star, supernova
shounakbhatta
shounakbhatta is offline
#1
Feb14-13, 10:54 AM
P: 268
Hello,

I want to understand: just as the Crab Nebula is the result of SN 1054 and has a neutron star spinning at the center:

(a) Does all supernova produces a nebula?
(b) Does all supernova remnant has a neutron star at the center?
(c) What is the outcome of Kepler supernova i.e. SN 1604? I mean to ask has it formed a stellar remnant or a neutron star?

(d) Say, if we consider a supernova, S, which has happened in the year 1000, then the stellar remnant, the neutron star or whatever other outcomes have come in that supernova, does it remain forever? I mean to say, is there a specific time duration, after which things die out and nothing is there from that specific supernova?

Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
phinds
phinds is online now
#2
Feb14-13, 11:10 AM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,705
Quote Quote by shounakbhatta View Post

(b) Does all supernova remnant has a neutron star at the center?
No, some of them form black holes.
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#3
Feb14-13, 05:39 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,183
Some stars are destroyed by the explosion [pair instability supernova], most become neutron stars, and some possibly become black holes - although we have no observational evidence of a black hole that formed as a consequence of a supernova. Neutron stars, like white dwarfs, are believed capable of surviving for many billions of years before succumbing to old age and becoming black dwarfs. The universe is believed to be too young for this to have yet happened. Neutron stars are also difficult to detect. They are very small and nearly invisible below x ray wavelengths. Neutron stars are also considered strong candidates for gamma ray bursts, some of which are believed to be the result of neutron star mergers. It is also believed such mergers can lead to the formation of a black hole.

shounakbhatta
shounakbhatta is offline
#4
Feb15-13, 10:04 AM
P: 268

Supernova remnants & neutron star


One question: Is there any stellar remnant or a neutron star as a result of the Kepler super nova?
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#5
Feb15-13, 05:00 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,183
Yes, an image taken with the Chandra X-ray observatory is here http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2012/kepler/. This little wisp of glowing dust and gas is all that remains. It was produced by a type Ia supernova, which destroys the progenitor star.
shounakbhatta
shounakbhatta is offline
#6
Feb16-13, 12:08 PM
P: 268
That means it does not have a neutron star?
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#7
Feb16-13, 11:07 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,183
Yes, it only left that little puff of smoke.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
neutron decay at neutron star High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
The star Betelgeuse going supernova soon? General Astronomy 35
Rapid Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A Triggered by Neutron Superfluidity Astrophysics 3
What's the most distant observed star which is not a supernova or quasar? General Astronomy 1
n-star vs. BH supernova Astrophysics 4