Register to reply

Python 2 vs Python 3 for Computational Tasks

by thegreenlaser
Tags: computational, python, tasks
Share this thread:
thegreenlaser
#1
Feb15-13, 08:07 PM
P: 461
I've decided to learn Python (having a background in C++ and Matlab), and I'm a little unsure about which version to get. I've read in a few places that Python 2.x is better because packages like numpy and scipy don't work with Python 3.x, but this seems to be out of date since as far as I can tell, these packages do support Python 3.x now. I plan to do mostly do computations (e.g. modeling/simulation) and then visualizations of those computations. Have most of the important packages for this type of thing been ported over to Python 3.x or am I safer going with Python 2.x?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
jhae2.718
#2
Feb15-13, 08:34 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
This may help you with your decision. In my lab we use Python 2 since it's more supported. Python 3 is a cleaner, better language, but Python 2 still has a lot of inertia.

My advice would be to go with Python 3 if you can, keeping in mind much of the available Python code is still targeted at Python 2.

If you do use Python 2, it's good practice to write code that is forward-compatible with Python 3. A simple example is the print functionality, which is a statement in Python 2, used as:
print foo
but a function in Python 3:
print(bar)
The Python 3 functionality can be acheived by calling
from __future__ import print_function
print(bar)
There are other changes between the versions which you can find online.
gsal
#3
Feb16-13, 09:58 AM
P: 873
Quote Quote by jhae2.718 View Post
My advice would be to go with Python 3 if you can, keeping in mind much of the available Python code is still targeted at Python 2.
That's funny...when I started to read the advice and thought the opposite was going to be recommended. Since it wasn't...I will recommend the opposite.

Kind of learn Python 2 and 3 in a encompassing way so that you write Python 2 in a 3-compatible manner...that way, you know for sure that no module is going to stop you from doing your work; THEN, when all modules have been ported and 3 is as complete as 2 is today...your code should be easy to port...I thought at some point they were writing a program that would convert your Python 2 code to Python 3...I bet it works good when Python 2 has already been written with Python 3 in mind.

AlephZero
#4
Feb16-13, 10:13 AM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 6,967
Python 2 vs Python 3 for Computational Tasks

This is the sort of issue that keeps "not for profit" software as a minority interest, unfortunately.

If the inventors of Python 2 have invented a "better" but incompatible language, good for them. But calling it "Python 3" and assuming that the rest of the Python community would instantly drop whatever else they were working on and port all their existing code was somewhere between "dumb" and "naive" IMO.

As the old proverb says, sometimes "the best is the enemy of the good".
jhae2.718
#5
Feb16-13, 03:18 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
Quote Quote by gsal View Post
...I thought at some point they were writing a program that would convert your Python 2 code to Python 3...I bet it works good when Python 2 has already been written with Python 3 in mind.
There's 2to3, or something similar, but I don't know how well it works.
gsal
#6
Feb16-13, 05:49 PM
P: 873
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
This is the sort of issue that keeps "not for profit" software as a minority interest, unfortunately.
Hhhhmmm....I don't know, AlephZero, I think I could argue that you may have it backwards.

It is precisely because Python is open source and "not for profit" that thegreenlaser actually has a choice! Nobody is forcing s/he to pick one or the other or to "move forward" onto a specific version. If it was proprietary software, licensed, etc...s/he could very well have no choice but to start using the present version of a software regardless of base, popularity, bug-iness, etc. and simply because the previous one is no longer available.

Anyway, that's just one of the things software freedom is about.
Hurkyl
#7
Feb16-13, 05:56 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,092
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
As the old proverb says, sometimes "the best is the enemy of the good".
Er, that proverb usually refers to the situation where people reject using a good solution in favor searching for a mythical best solution -- not the situation where people are using something good and then something better comes along.
ultrasmart
#8
Feb16-13, 06:31 PM
P: 30
Quote Quote by thegreenlaser View Post
I've read in a few places that Python 2.x is better because packages like numpy and scipy don't work with Python 3.x, but this seems to be out of date
By no means!!!!!.. Python 2 is the most common version for all uses from commercial software to scientific purposes and Python 3 is a future version and no one knows when it will be widely used, and most professional Python programmers use Python 2 these days.

In addition, More versions of Python 2 are still released, what tells that Python 2 will not be out of date soon!!!!
jhae2.718
#9
Feb16-13, 10:19 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
Quote Quote by ultrasmart View Post
More versions of Python 2 are still released, what tells that Python 2 will not be out of date soon!!!!
Python 2.7 will be the last major release in the 2.x series, which is going into what the PSF is calling an "extended maintenance period."

http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.7.3/
thegreenlaser
#10
Feb17-13, 12:51 PM
P: 461
Thanks everyone. I guess there's no real clear consensus on this issue, so I've decided to go with Python 2 just because of bigger library and better supporting documentation. As a casual programmer doing stuff for myself I'm guessing it won't make all that much of a difference in the end.
Borek
#11
Feb17-13, 01:15 PM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 23,406
Quote Quote by thegreenlaser View Post
Thanks everyone. I guess there's no real clear consensus on this issue, so I've decided to go with Python 2 just because of bigger library and better supporting documentation. As a casual programmer doing stuff for myself I'm guessing it won't make all that much of a difference in the end.
I would just check what are the major differences to keep them in mind while programming, so that the code would be easier to port in future (in case it will be necessary).
qspeechc
#12
May7-13, 05:53 AM
P: 792
Sorry for digging up an old thread, but I wanted to ask the same question, only I have no experience with programming at all (besides a little bit of Matlab), and I want to start by learning Python. I can't really tell from this thread which version is best, lol.

On their website they say

If you don't know which version to use, try Python 3.3. Some existing third-party software is not yet compatible with Python 3; if you need to use such software, you can download Python 2.7.x instead.
Since I'm just starting out, I suppose the 3rd-party stuff is not important, but from what I gather, version 2 is still the most commonly used, so which do I get?

Thanks.

Edit: saying "if you don't know, try Python 3.3" sounds a little sneaky to me...
I did read this page, and it's all Greek to me, no help at all.
Borek
#13
May7-13, 06:28 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 23,406
Quote Quote by qspeechc View Post
Edit: saying "if you don't know, try Python 3.3" sounds a little sneaky to me...
Sounds quite logical to me, and I believe it to be the correct approach (even if my experience with Python is very limited).
qspeechc
#14
May7-13, 06:46 AM
P: 792
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
Sounds quite logical to me, and I believe it to be the correct approach (even if my experience with Python is very limited).
I was referring to the language they chose to use.
"Here, try this..."
"What is it?"
"Just try it..."
I would feel more assured if they said "If you don't know which version to use, download 3.3.1" or something like that, but that's being silly, I know.
Solkar
#15
May7-13, 11:10 AM
P: 100
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
assuming that the rest of the Python community would instantly drop whatever else they were working on and port all their existing code was somewhere between "dumb" and "naive" IMO.
I second that.

For my business, the most tragic victim of such a "drop" would be our usage of omniORBpy for CORBA prototyping and development scripting.

No way.
None at all.
qspeechc
#16
May13-13, 10:34 AM
P: 792
I have still found this thread of very little help. Accidentally I found this, from this page (under "Warnings for Beginners"):

A programmer may try to get you to install Python 3 and learn that. You should tell them, "When all of the python code on your computer is Python 3, then I'll try to learn it." That should keep them busy for about 10 years.
Unfortunately, when I read that, I had already downloaded Python 3 and started learning it with another book written for Python 2.

I just wanted to add this for other beginners who can find no guidance on this topic.
Borek
#17
May13-13, 11:09 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 23,406
Have you run into any problems because you use 3.3?
qspeechc
#18
May15-13, 02:52 AM
P: 792
The author of the book I'm using says it can be used by both Python 3 and 2 users, but some of the things in the book do not work in Python 3, so it seems he doesn't even use Python 3. It's quite a pain trawling the internet trying to see how things should be done in Python 3, otherwise you have to figure it out on your own, which is terrible for a complete beginner.

Most of the help for beginners is actually written for other programmers, i.e. it's not actually comprehensible to real beginners. And most of the stuff on the web seems to be for Python 2 as well.

That's the end of my rant, thank you, lol.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Compile Python, Matlab and Python Programming & Computer Science 3
Help in Python rk4 Programming & Computer Science 1
Problem statement: If you have a list, how do you count the Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 2
Help in Python for Computational Physics Advanced Physics Homework 0
Python rk4 Programming & Computer Science 0