Python 2 vs Python 3 for Computational Tasks


by thegreenlaser
Tags: computational, python, tasks
thegreenlaser
thegreenlaser is offline
#1
Feb15-13, 08:07 PM
P: 443
I've decided to learn Python (having a background in C++ and Matlab), and I'm a little unsure about which version to get. I've read in a few places that Python 2.x is better because packages like numpy and scipy don't work with Python 3.x, but this seems to be out of date since as far as I can tell, these packages do support Python 3.x now. I plan to do mostly do computations (e.g. modeling/simulation) and then visualizations of those computations. Have most of the important packages for this type of thing been ported over to Python 3.x or am I safer going with Python 2.x?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
jhae2.718
jhae2.718 is offline
#2
Feb15-13, 08:34 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
This may help you with your decision. In my lab we use Python 2 since it's more supported. Python 3 is a cleaner, better language, but Python 2 still has a lot of inertia.

My advice would be to go with Python 3 if you can, keeping in mind much of the available Python code is still targeted at Python 2.

If you do use Python 2, it's good practice to write code that is forward-compatible with Python 3. A simple example is the print functionality, which is a statement in Python 2, used as:
print foo
but a function in Python 3:
print(bar)
The Python 3 functionality can be acheived by calling
from __future__ import print_function
print(bar)
There are other changes between the versions which you can find online.
gsal
gsal is offline
#3
Feb16-13, 09:58 AM
P: 838
Quote Quote by jhae2.718 View Post
My advice would be to go with Python 3 if you can, keeping in mind much of the available Python code is still targeted at Python 2.
That's funny...when I started to read the advice and thought the opposite was going to be recommended. Since it wasn't...I will recommend the opposite.

Kind of learn Python 2 and 3 in a encompassing way so that you write Python 2 in a 3-compatible manner...that way, you know for sure that no module is going to stop you from doing your work; THEN, when all modules have been ported and 3 is as complete as 2 is today...your code should be easy to port...I thought at some point they were writing a program that would convert your Python 2 code to Python 3...I bet it works good when Python 2 has already been written with Python 3 in mind.

AlephZero
AlephZero is offline
#4
Feb16-13, 10:13 AM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 6,349

Python 2 vs Python 3 for Computational Tasks


This is the sort of issue that keeps "not for profit" software as a minority interest, unfortunately.

If the inventors of Python 2 have invented a "better" but incompatible language, good for them. But calling it "Python 3" and assuming that the rest of the Python community would instantly drop whatever else they were working on and port all their existing code was somewhere between "dumb" and "naive" IMO.

As the old proverb says, sometimes "the best is the enemy of the good".
jhae2.718
jhae2.718 is offline
#5
Feb16-13, 03:18 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
Quote Quote by gsal View Post
...I thought at some point they were writing a program that would convert your Python 2 code to Python 3...I bet it works good when Python 2 has already been written with Python 3 in mind.
There's 2to3, or something similar, but I don't know how well it works.
gsal
gsal is offline
#6
Feb16-13, 05:49 PM
P: 838
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
This is the sort of issue that keeps "not for profit" software as a minority interest, unfortunately.
Hhhhmmm....I don't know, AlephZero, I think I could argue that you may have it backwards.

It is precisely because Python is open source and "not for profit" that thegreenlaser actually has a choice! Nobody is forcing s/he to pick one or the other or to "move forward" onto a specific version. If it was proprietary software, licensed, etc...s/he could very well have no choice but to start using the present version of a software regardless of base, popularity, bug-iness, etc. and simply because the previous one is no longer available.

Anyway, that's just one of the things software freedom is about.
Hurkyl
Hurkyl is offline
#7
Feb16-13, 05:56 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,101
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
As the old proverb says, sometimes "the best is the enemy of the good".
Er, that proverb usually refers to the situation where people reject using a good solution in favor searching for a mythical best solution -- not the situation where people are using something good and then something better comes along.
ultrasmart
ultrasmart is offline
#8
Feb16-13, 06:31 PM
P: 30
Quote Quote by thegreenlaser View Post
I've read in a few places that Python 2.x is better because packages like numpy and scipy don't work with Python 3.x, but this seems to be out of date
By no means!!!!!.. Python 2 is the most common version for all uses from commercial software to scientific purposes and Python 3 is a future version and no one knows when it will be widely used, and most professional Python programmers use Python 2 these days.

In addition, More versions of Python 2 are still released, what tells that Python 2 will not be out of date soon!!!!
jhae2.718
jhae2.718 is offline
#9
Feb16-13, 10:19 PM
PF Gold
jhae2.718's Avatar
P: 1,153
Quote Quote by ultrasmart View Post
More versions of Python 2 are still released, what tells that Python 2 will not be out of date soon!!!!
Python 2.7 will be the last major release in the 2.x series, which is going into what the PSF is calling an "extended maintenance period."

http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.7.3/
thegreenlaser
thegreenlaser is offline
#10
Feb17-13, 12:51 PM
P: 443
Thanks everyone. I guess there's no real clear consensus on this issue, so I've decided to go with Python 2 just because of bigger library and better supporting documentation. As a casual programmer doing stuff for myself I'm guessing it won't make all that much of a difference in the end.
Borek
Borek is offline
#11
Feb17-13, 01:15 PM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,679
Quote Quote by thegreenlaser View Post
Thanks everyone. I guess there's no real clear consensus on this issue, so I've decided to go with Python 2 just because of bigger library and better supporting documentation. As a casual programmer doing stuff for myself I'm guessing it won't make all that much of a difference in the end.
I would just check what are the major differences to keep them in mind while programming, so that the code would be easier to port in future (in case it will be necessary).
qspeechc
qspeechc is offline
#12
May7-13, 05:53 AM
P: 792
Sorry for digging up an old thread, but I wanted to ask the same question, only I have no experience with programming at all (besides a little bit of Matlab), and I want to start by learning Python. I can't really tell from this thread which version is best, lol.

On their website they say

If you don't know which version to use, try Python 3.3. Some existing third-party software is not yet compatible with Python 3; if you need to use such software, you can download Python 2.7.x instead.
Since I'm just starting out, I suppose the 3rd-party stuff is not important, but from what I gather, version 2 is still the most commonly used, so which do I get?

Thanks.

Edit: saying "if you don't know, try Python 3.3" sounds a little sneaky to me...
I did read this page, and it's all Greek to me, no help at all.
Borek
Borek is offline
#13
May7-13, 06:28 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,679
Quote Quote by qspeechc View Post
Edit: saying "if you don't know, try Python 3.3" sounds a little sneaky to me...
Sounds quite logical to me, and I believe it to be the correct approach (even if my experience with Python is very limited).
qspeechc
qspeechc is offline
#14
May7-13, 06:46 AM
P: 792
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
Sounds quite logical to me, and I believe it to be the correct approach (even if my experience with Python is very limited).
I was referring to the language they chose to use.
"Here, try this..."
"What is it?"
"Just try it..."
I would feel more assured if they said "If you don't know which version to use, download 3.3.1" or something like that, but that's being silly, I know.
Solkar
Solkar is offline
#15
May7-13, 11:10 AM
P: 100
Quote Quote by AlephZero View Post
assuming that the rest of the Python community would instantly drop whatever else they were working on and port all their existing code was somewhere between "dumb" and "naive" IMO.
I second that.

For my business, the most tragic victim of such a "drop" would be our usage of omniORBpy for CORBA prototyping and development scripting.

No way.
None at all.
qspeechc
qspeechc is offline
#16
May13-13, 10:34 AM
P: 792
I have still found this thread of very little help. Accidentally I found this, from this page (under "Warnings for Beginners"):

A programmer may try to get you to install Python 3 and learn that. You should tell them, "When all of the python code on your computer is Python 3, then I'll try to learn it." That should keep them busy for about 10 years.
Unfortunately, when I read that, I had already downloaded Python 3 and started learning it with another book written for Python 2.

I just wanted to add this for other beginners who can find no guidance on this topic.
Borek
Borek is offline
#17
May13-13, 11:09 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,679
Have you run into any problems because you use 3.3?
qspeechc
qspeechc is offline
#18
May15-13, 02:52 AM
P: 792
The author of the book I'm using says it can be used by both Python 3 and 2 users, but some of the things in the book do not work in Python 3, so it seems he doesn't even use Python 3. It's quite a pain trawling the internet trying to see how things should be done in Python 3, otherwise you have to figure it out on your own, which is terrible for a complete beginner.

Most of the help for beginners is actually written for other programmers, i.e. it's not actually comprehensible to real beginners. And most of the stuff on the web seems to be for Python 2 as well.

That's the end of my rant, thank you, lol.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Compile Python, Matlab and Python Programming & Computer Science 3
help in Python rk4 Programming & Computer Science 1
[B]Problem statement:[/B]If you have a list, how do you count the Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 2
Help in Python for Computational Physics Advanced Physics Homework 0
Python rk4 Programming & Computer Science 0