Understanding Atomic Dipoles and Spontaneous Emission


by McLaren Rulez
Tags: atomic, dipoles, emission, spontaneous
McLaren Rulez
McLaren Rulez is offline
#1
Feb18-13, 11:49 AM
P: 261
Hi,

In quantum optics, the interaction between light and atoms is described by a Hamiltonian of the form d.E where d is the dipole moment of the atom. The picture given is basically that this is a vector and we take the the dot product with this and the electric field vector (whose direction comes from the polarization direction). I don't understand why the atom has this asymmetry.

1) If the atom is spherically symmetric, how do we get this dipole pointing in one specific direction? Can an experimentalist put an atom with its dipole pointing in a specific way?

2) If we look at spontaneous emission, the rate is given by the Einstein A coefficient which is reproduced using quantum optics. It is
[tex]
\Gamma=\frac{\omega^{2}d^{2}}{3\pi\epsilon_{0} \hbar c^{3}}
[/tex]
Is this sponteanous emission spatially isotropic or is there more radiation in some directions compared to others?

I feel that I may have some misconceptions regarding the whole thing. Please do correct me if I do. Thank you :)
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers develop scalable methods for manufacturing metamaterials
Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy
After 13 years, progress in pitch-drop experiment (w/ video)
DrDu
DrDu is offline
#2
Feb19-13, 01:55 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,369
1) The point is that d is an operator and, even if you start from a spherically symmetric electronic wavefunction, the operator induces a transition to a state which is not spherically symmetric. E.g. in a hydrogen atom from an s function to a p function.
2) The emission of a single atom will not be isotropic, however the formula for the Einstein A coefficient is averaged over many atoms and the radiation emitted spontaneously by a large ensemble of atoms is isotropic on the mean. This averaging leads to the factor 3 in the denominator.
McLaren Rulez
McLaren Rulez is offline
#3
Feb19-13, 02:26 AM
P: 261
Thanks DrDu. So the actual radiation pattern be the same as that due to the dipole antenna, I assume.

Also, is it possible to experimentally orient the atomic dipole in any direction we want? Or is it a random process?

Thank you

DrDu
DrDu is offline
#4
Feb19-13, 04:24 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,369

Understanding Atomic Dipoles and Spontaneous Emission


With an atom in a spherically symmetric ground state this is difficult.
You could use e.g. the Stark effect to split the final levels of the transition.
It is much easier with molecules whose molecular axes can be oriented, e.g. in a crystal or polymer matrix.
DrClaude
DrClaude is offline
#5
Feb19-13, 04:31 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
DrClaude's Avatar
P: 1,111
Quote Quote by DrDu View Post
With an atom in a spherically symmetric ground state this is difficult.
Why? If you take a dilute gas of atoms (where collisions are not important) and shine polarized light on it, you will get polarized atoms.
DrDu
DrDu is offline
#6
Feb19-13, 05:47 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,369
Quote Quote by DrClaude View Post
Why? If you take a dilute gas of atoms (where collisions are not important) and shine polarized light on it, you will get polarized atoms.
Admittedly true. I was more referring to spontaneous emission.
McLaren Rulez
McLaren Rulez is offline
#7
Feb19-13, 07:32 AM
P: 261
Thank you for the replies! I have a much better idea of the process now.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Spontaneous vs Stimulated Emission Quantum Physics 4
Relation between spontaneous emission, absorption and re-emission... Classical Physics 1
Spontaneous emission Quantum Physics 0
two photons spontaneous emission (2s->1s) Quantum Physics 11
spontaneous emission Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 31