How is a self-adjoint linear operator defined in quantum mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trosten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and interpretation of self-adjoint linear operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the expression and its relation to the norm of the operator applied to a state vector. Participants explore different definitions found in various texts and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the equivalence of two definitions of , noting that one book defines it in terms of the norm of the operator applied to a state vector, while another defines it as the projection of A|u> on |u>.
  • Another participant asserts that the two expressions are not equal, explaining that represents the average of the observable A, while the norm ||A|u>||^2 relates to the square of the operator's matrix element.
  • A third participant proposes a specific case where the operator is defined as A=|n>
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of identifying whether the operator in question is a true and idempotent orthogonal projector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and interpretations of self-adjoint operators, with no consensus reached on the equivalence of the definitions presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in definitions and the need for clarity regarding the types of operators being discussed, particularly in relation to their properties as projectors.

trosten
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
How do u define this <u|A|u>? where A is a selfadjoint linear operator.

I have one book that defines is as ||A|u>||^2=<u|A|u>
(equation 2.6 http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.ps)

and since ||A|u>||^2 is the length of the vector A|u> squared that is equal to (<u|A)(A|u>).

I have another book (j.j sakurai) that defines it as (<u|)(A|u>)=(<u|A)(|u>)=<u|A|u> but this is the projection of A|u> on |u>.

It seems to me that the two definitions arent equal !? Any ideas? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course,they're not equal,as they involve different "animals".

[tex]\langle \psi|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle[/tex]

is the mean/avrerage of the observable A described by the selfadjoint operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] on the quantum state [itex]|\psi \rangle[/itex]
,while the norm
[tex]|| \hat{A}|\psi\rangle ||^{2}[/tex]

involves the matrix element of the SQUARE of the operator...

Daniel.

P.S.The operator is selfadjoint,that's why is the square...
 
Last edited:
I found the solution to the problem myself. If the operator is A=|n><n| then ofcourse AA = (|n><n|)(|n><n|) = |n><n|n><n| = |n><n| = A
Ofcourse repeated projections shouldn't change anything! silly me.
 
OKay,u should have told right from the beginning that u're interested in true and IDEMPOTENT ortogonal projectors... :wink:

Daniel.
 
haha yeah didnt think about that :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K