Integral - what does it represent?


by Benny
Tags: integral, represent
Benny
Benny is offline
#1
Nov30-05, 12:02 AM
P: 585
Hi, I am given the following integral.

[tex]
\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_S^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to } } \bullet d\mathop S\limits^ \to = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to \bullet \mathop n\limits^ \to } } dS
[/tex]

The n vector is an outward unit normal. So does the RHS of the above represent how much 'stuff' is coming out of a surface? Or does it have something to do with what is happening on a surface? The book says that the integral is called the flux of F across S. In many examples, there are little arrows point out of the surface so I'm not sure what the integral is supposed to represent.

Any help would be good thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Review: With Galaxy S5, Samsung proves less can be more
Making graphene in your kitchen
Study casts doubt on climate benefit of biofuels from corn residue
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#2
Nov30-05, 06:30 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,886
Yes, both of those can be interpreted to represent the total "flow" of something across the surface (so that flow in opposite directions at different parts of the surface cancel). I am, however, puzzled over what "S" and "D" are. For those to be equal, in general, S and D must be the same.
benorin
benorin is offline
#3
Nov30-05, 09:12 AM
HW Helper
P: 1,007
D and S are right next to each other on one's keyboard.

Benny
Benny is offline
#4
Nov30-05, 07:51 PM
P: 585

Integral - what does it represent?


Oops, I need to be more careful when copying out the definitions. Thanks for the help.

Edit: In many of the questions I've been doing, the procedure is generally to rewrite the integral so that the dS is repalced by ndA where n is a normal to the surface. After the replacement, instead of integrating over a surface, is the integration done over the x-y plane?
benorin
benorin is offline
#5
Dec3-05, 05:04 AM
HW Helper
P: 1,007
The form you put above is still a surface integral on either side, further work is required to change such into a double integral over a domain D in the xy-plane; one such way is to parameterize the surface by, say [itex]\vec{r}(u,v)[/itex] where the parameters u and v range over values in D, the formula is then

[tex]\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_S^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to } } \bullet d\mathop S\limits^ \to = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to \left( \vec{r}(u,v) \right) \bullet \left( \vec{r}_{u} \times \vec{r}_{v}\right) } } dA[/tex]
Benny
Benny is offline
#6
Dec3-05, 07:02 AM
P: 585
Ok thanks for the clarification. I've been working through some questions using the procedure you've presented during the last few days so I'm fairly comfortable with them now.
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#7
Dec3-05, 08:03 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,886
[tex]\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_S^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to } } \bullet d\mathop S\limits^ \to = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_S^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to \bullet \mathop n\limits^ \to } } dS[/tex]
Just different ways of writing the same thing:
[tex]d\mathop S\limits^ \to [/tex] is defined as [tex]\mathop n\limits^ \to } } dS[/tex]
Yes, it can be interpreted as "flux of F across S"- that is, the rate at which some property (whatever F represents) is flowing through surface S. One way to interpret the Divergence theorem:
[tex]\int\int\int\limits_B^{ } (\nabla \bullet \mathop v\limits^ \to )dV= \int\int_S \mathops v\limit^ \to \bullet d\mathop \sigma\limit^ \to [/tex]
is that the amount of something inside region B depends upon how much is flowing in or out through the surface S.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What does the other 7-dimensions represent? Beyond the Standard Model 13
what does these simbols represent?? Electrical Engineering 3
What do errors represent? Introductory Physics Homework 1
How do I represent this relationship Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4