Graviational effect of quarks and strong force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the gravitational effects on quarks and the strong force, particularly in extreme gravitational environments. Participants explore the theoretical implications of these effects, including the possibility of tetraquark formation under intense gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that intense gravity could weaken the strong force between quarks, potentially allowing quarks from different atoms to combine into tetraquarks.
  • Others challenge this assertion, questioning the evidence for the claim that gravity affects the strong force and requesting specific references to support it.
  • A participant clarifies that it was the weak force they intended to refer to, not the strong force, and cites Stephen Hawking's work as a source.
  • Another participant argues that high-energy particles do not demonstrate a weakening of the strong force and that gravity should have minimal impact on tetraquark formation, emphasizing the role of wave-functions instead.
  • One participant mentions that coupling constants do not reach zero at high energies and that the strong force remains confined, only becoming a quark-gluon plasma under extreme conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravity and the strong force, with no consensus reached on whether gravity affects quark interactions or the formation of tetraquarks.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the effects of gravity on particle interactions, and the discussion references theoretical concepts without definitive experimental backing.

taylordnz
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
with intense gravity the strong force between quarks are weakened. would it be possible that under extreme gravitational effects that quarks from other atoms join to make the theoretical tetraquark?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by taylordnz
with intense gravity the strong force between quarks are weakened.
Can you back this statement up with some evidence?

- Warren
 
the strong force

sorry but i meant to say it is the weak force that is weakened

source of fact:

the illustrated history of time by stephen hawking (updated and expanded version)
 


Originally posted by taylordnz
the illustrated history of time by stephen hawking (updated and expanded version)
Please quote the relevant passage.

- Warren
 
the relevant message

the strong force is weakened with particles with increased energy for example in particle accelerators, big bang.

quoted exactly from

The illustrated a brief history of time by stephen hawking (updated and expanded edition)

including:
particles with high energy have increased mass for example in big bang and in high ggravitational objects (black holes)

quoted exactly from

Time (by someone i can't remember)
 
Last edited:
I see no connection there, just a statement that high-energy particles have an increased mass. And that is only true when observing the particle from another frame of reference; if you were moving with the particle, it would not appear to you to have an increased mass.

The strong force does not yet show any sign of being affected by increased mass or gravity. I have some experience with particle acceleration myself, namely with Fermilab data. Particle acceleration does not weaken the strong force, as I believe you are trying to infer from the said statement, but rather is a probe for studying it.

Gravity of any valid strength should have little or no bearing on the formation of tetraquarks. X(3872), as it is called, is confined by its wave-function, not by gravity.

Either elaborate more on your idea, or quote more of the said passage from Hawking word for word so that we can get an idea of the context. And remember, Hawking is a theorist, not an experimentalist.
 
All of the coupling constants do the same thing at higher energies. They never actually seem to have a point where they will reach zero, though. As is, it seems that we cannot even get the strong constant to drop below 0.1 at energies nearing 200 TeV. The principle of asymptotic freedom continues to hold at the center-of-mass, as well, and the confinement of quarks can only be violated enough to generate a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at best; still somewhat confined, just many more degrees of freedom.
 
Moderator note: I split TornadoCreator's post off to the theory development forum.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K