Velocity Question - How Fast Does It Move?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wooh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of a powerful spinning machine with extensive tubing in a vacuum, examining the implications of classical and relativistic physics on the speed of the machine's outer parts. Participants explore concepts of velocity, energy requirements, time dilation, and length contraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a spinning machine rotates at a high speed, suggesting that the outer parts would move at twice the speed of light according to classical physics.
  • Another participant challenges the feasibility of achieving such speeds, stating that as the machine accelerates, the energy required approaches infinity, preventing the tubing's end from reaching the speed of light.
  • A participant requests clarification on why infinite energy is needed to reach the speed of light, questioning the impact of the tubing's length on this requirement.
  • In response, another participant explains that relativistic effects alter the kinetic energy formula, indicating that the end of the tubing cannot reach the speed of light regardless of its length.
  • One participant speculates whether the end of the tubing would experience time dilation while the base does not, potentially resulting in a spiral formation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of speed and energy in the proposed scenario, with no consensus reached regarding the behavior of the machine or the tubing under relativistic conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the structural integrity of the tubing and the effects of relativistic physics, which are not fully resolved. The implications of time dilation and length contraction are acknowledged but not conclusively applied to the scenario.

Wooh
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Ok, let's say that we are in a giant vaccuum, but we have a crapload of space. A crapload. And we get a really powerful spinning machine and a tone of tubing. Really powerful, lots of tubing. Then we get the tubing and attach it to the machine, and let's say we attach the an amount of tubing equal to [tex]\displaystyle{\frac{c}{600}}[/tex]. We then get the machine rotate at [tex]\displaystyle{\frac{600}{\pi}}[/tex] revolutions per second. At the outskirts of the machine, it would be rotating at 2 times the speed of light, according to classical physics. How would it really act? Would it form a spiral, as it got farther away and time dilated more? How would you figure out how fast the parts would really be moving?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. First assuming that your tubing could withstand the stress, you could never get the machine up to 600/[pi] rps in the first place.

As you speed up the machine, the extreme end of the tubing will approach c, as it does so, the amount of energy it takes to accelerate it further increases, and approaches infinity. Thus no matter how powerful the machine, it will always fall short of getting the end of the tubing up to c. (Besides, if you keep upping the maximum power of the machine, eventually you will will reach the structual limt of the tubing and it will shear. )

In either case, the end never reaches c.
 
Can you please explain why it takes an infinite amount of energy to get it up to C? If possible, an explanation for a newb :) Would you still have the problem if the rod where only half as long? If not, then why would the length of the rod matter at all if it is only being extended?
 
Originally posted by Wooh
Can you please explain why it takes an infinite amount of energy to get it up to C? If possible, an explanation for a newb :) Would you still have the problem if the rod where only half as long? If not, then why would the length of the rod matter at all if it is only being extended?

Put quite simply, when you take the time dilation and length contractions into account, the kinetic energy formula is changed from
[tex]E=\frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

to

[tex]E = mc^2\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}-1 \right)[/tex]

Yes, you still have the same problem if the tubing is shortened. You still can't get the end up to c.
 
So would the end dilate while the bottom doesn't, thus forming a dilated spiral or something?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K