| Thread Closed |
Find a cubic function... |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar26-06, 11:08 AM | #1 |
|
|
Find a cubic function...
Find a cubic function [tex] f(x) = ax^3 - bx^2 + cx - d [/tex] that has a local maximum value of 40 at x = 1 and a local minimum valud of -68 at x = 4
Since x = 1 and x = 4 are the max and min, respectively, then f'(x) must equal 0 at x = 1 and x = 4. Therefore [tex] f'(x) = (x-1)(x-4) = x^2 - 5x +4 [/tex] Using the original function [tex] f'(x) = 3ax^2 - 2bx +c = x^2 - 5x + 4[/tex] Setting the terms equal to each other we get [tex] 3ax^2 = x^2 \Rightarrow a = \frac{1}{3} [/tex] [tex] -2bx = -5x \Rightarrow b = \frac{5}{2} [/tex] [tex] c = 4 [/tex] Substituting these values back into the original equation I get [tex] f(x) = \frac{x^3}{3} - \frac{5x^2}{2} + 4 - d [/tex] When I solve for d using x = 1 and f(x) = 40 I get [tex] d = \frac{1}{3} - \frac{5}{2} - 36 = \frac{-229}{6} [/tex] However, when I solve for d using x = 4 and f(x) = -68 I get [tex] d = \frac{4^3}{3} - \frac{5(4^2)}{2} + 84 = \frac{226}{3} [/tex] Any ideas where I went wrong, or if I was down the wrong track to start with? Thanks Jeff |
| Mar26-06, 11:22 AM | #2 |
|
|
Eeh, from what I can see, we must have:
[tex]f'(x)=K(x-1)(x-4)[/tex], where K is some arbitrary constant. |
| Mar26-06, 12:38 PM | #3 |
|
|
So if that was brought into the equation, would I be solving for a, b, c, & d in terms of K?
|
| Mar26-06, 01:14 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Find a cubic function...
No, you need to solve for a value of K and a value for the integration constant which give you the desired values at x=1 and 4. And don't worry about solving a,b,c,d seperately as unknown variables. Just find the right cubic and then you just can read them off.
|
| Mar26-06, 01:21 PM | #5 |
|
|
Well, there was nothing inherently wrong about Jeff's idea. A bit cumbersome, that's all.
|
| Mar26-06, 04:43 PM | #6 |
|
|
Sorry, not familiar with the idea of an itegration constant. We just finished sections of optimization problems and Newton's method. The next section is antiderivatives. So I have to solve this without any concept of integration.
|
| Mar27-06, 07:27 AM | #7 |
|
|
Could someone direct me towards information on finding the integration constant, if that is indeed the most direct way to solve this problem?
Thanks Jeff |
| Mar27-06, 07:29 AM | #8 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Scratch the whole integration constant idea gig: no integration for you.
|
| Mar27-06, 07:46 AM | #9 |
|
|
f'= k(x-1)(x- 4)= kx^2- 5kx+ 4k= 3ax^2+ bx+ c so
a= k/3, b= -5k and c= 4k. Evaluate f(x)= (k/3)x^3- 5kx^2+ 4kx+ d at 1 and 4 to get two equations for k and d. |
| Mar27-06, 07:51 AM | #10 |
|
Recognitions:
|
We have 4 unknowns, hence we need 4 equations to solve: they are f(1)=40, f(4)=-68, f'(1)=0, and f'(4)=0.
|
| Mar27-06, 08:15 AM | #11 |
|
|
Where you went wrong in finding d in your OP was substituting the values at f'(x)=0 into f(x)...
You may also want to use: f''(1)<0, f''(4)>0 |
| Mar27-06, 09:32 AM | #12 |
|
|
Thanks to all. I used K(x-1)(x-4) = 0, solved for a, b, and c, then went back to the original equation and used x = 1 and x = 4 to get two equations for d in terms of K. I set them equal, solved for K, and when I plugged it back in I ended up with values for a, b, c, and d that satisfied all conditions.
|
| May15-07, 06:24 PM | #13 |
|
|
Can anyone explain this further? I have a similar problem, and I'm having trouble following what the correct answer Jeff figured out in the end was.
How does one make an equation for d in terms of K, for instance? |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Find a cubic function...
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Cubic Function | General Math | 2 | ||
| Getting Cubic Function | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Finding cubic function | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 3 | ||
| Inverse of a Cubic Function | General Math | 12 | ||
| Find The Equation Of A Cubic Relationship Given This Data | Introductory Physics Homework | 10 | ||