image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

Go Back   Physics Forums > Physics > Classical Physics


Reply

image Metals, X-rays, and plasma frequency Share It Thread Tools Search this Thread image
Old Apr16-06, 12:59 AM                  #1
pervect

pervect is Offline:
Posts: 5,369
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
Metals, X-rays, and plasma frequency

I was wondering if it would be fair to say that the frequency at which x-rays start to penetrate a metal would be the plasma frequency associated with the electron density of the metal, i.e. the frequency given by

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...Frequency.html

or whether some other mechanism was involved.
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 03:10 AM                  #2
Tide

Tide is Offline:
Posts: 3,132
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Helper
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Have you tried calculating the electron plasma frequency for some typical metals?
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 03:43 AM       Last edited by inha; Apr17-06 at 07:06 AM.. Reason: nonsensical sentence corrected            #3
inha

inha is Offline:
Posts: 577
you wouldn't be correct. plasmon energies are several orders of magnitude lower than the x-ray range.
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 04:20 AM                  #4
pervect

pervect is Offline:
Posts: 5,369
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
Originally Posted by Tide
Have you tried calculating the electron plasma frequency for some typical metals?
Using the MKS formula at

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1529021

and using N = 8.47 * 10^28 / m^3 for copper

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu.../fermi.html#c2

I am currently getting 2.6*10^15 hz

This seems to probably be a bit low, in the UV range. But I don't know what the effective mass of an electron in copper should be, nor do I know what the permittivity value should be - they probably shouldn't be the free-space values I used for both.

I also don't really know when copper starts transmitting x-rays, for that matter :-(.
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 04:37 PM                  #5
pervect

pervect is Offline:
Posts: 5,369
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
Originally Posted by inha
you wouldn't be correct. plasmon energies are several orders of magnitude lower than the x-ray range.
What's a plasmon?

It looks like the estimate in terms of plasma frequency misses the mark by a few orders of magnitude from remarks that have been made - any ideas of how can it be "fixed up" to get within, say, one order of magnitude?
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 04:49 PM                  #6
inha

inha is Offline:
Posts: 577
plasmons are charge density fluctuations (collective excitations) in metals. same stuff but treated quantum mechanically taking the proper electronic structure into account. I don't think you can get much closer since in a lot of metals the electron effective masses aren't too far from the bare electron mass.
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr17-06, 08:58 PM                  #7
Gokul43201
 
Gokul43201's Avatar

Gokul43201 is Offline:
Posts: 10,265
Recognitions:
PF Contributor PF Contributor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
Originally Posted by pervect
I was wondering if it would be fair to say that the frequency at which x-rays start to penetrate a metal would be the plasma frequency associated with the electron density of the metal, i.e. the frequency given by

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...Frequency.html

or whether some other mechanism was involved.
If you are trying to calculate the frequency at which a metal starts to become transparent to radiation, that would be the plasma frequency. Most metals are transparent at high UV frequencies.

So, to correct the statement in your OP :
...it would be fair to say that the frequency at which EM radiation starts to penetrate a metal would be the plasma frequency associated with the electron density of the metal...
  Reply With Quote
Old Apr18-06, 04:23 PM                  #8
pervect

pervect is Offline:
Posts: 5,369
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
OK, that answers the question, thanks. And it nicely explains why the semiconductor people have trouble building UV mirrors, too.
  Reply With Quote
image image
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Metals, X-rays, and plasma frequency
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dielectric constant, metals, frequency... a bit confused MadMax Classical Physics 11 Sep8-09 05:06 AM
Plasma Frequency luke Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 8 Jan28-09 11:04 PM
Parallel RLC circuit: find resonant frequency and Input at that frequency VinnyCee Introductory Physics 7 Sep24-08 11:36 PM
Information on X-rays and Gamma Rays Astronuc Nuclear Engineering 1 Dec3-04 10:44 AM

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image