Gravity vs Diffusion: Contradiction or Reality?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffusion Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between diffusion and gravity, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding their interactions. It is established that Newton's law of gravity has minimal effect on the behavior of small particles, such as air molecules or those suspended in water. Instead, the motion and collisions of these particles drive diffusion, causing them to spread out rather than being influenced by gravitational forces. The conversation concludes with a question regarding the mass threshold at which gravity begins to dominate over diffusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of gravity
  • Basic principles of particle motion and collisions
  • Knowledge of diffusion processes in gases and liquids
  • Familiarity with molecular behavior in physics and chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of diffusion in gases and liquids
  • Study the effects of molecular collisions on particle behavior
  • Examine the mass thresholds where gravitational forces become significant
  • Explore advanced topics in statistical mechanics related to particle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, chemistry, and biology, particularly those interested in the dynamics of particle interactions and the principles of diffusion versus gravitational forces.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
The concept of diffusion is confusing me, as it seems to contradict gravity.

x = particles of matter with a mass of 1
| = a barrier particle x can permeate

Situation A:
xxxxx|x


(1)In my biology class, we're told, and do experiments to prove that, in this situation, the result will be:


Result of Situation A (tested approximately)
xxx|xxx


The explanation of this is that the particles are simply too tightly packed and want to expand.


(2)However, Newtons law of gravity would show that the 5x's would attract the 1x with a force 5 times greater than the 1x would attract the 5x's(I think). Therefore, in order to equal out(3x's per side), wouldn't the 1x need to pull twice as hard on the 5x's? Doesn't Newtons law of gravity show that the result of that experiment would tend towards the side with 5x's at least keeping all of it's particles, if not gaining the 1x?

Oh god I'm so confused...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's law of gravity has nothing to do with this- the gravitational pull of one small particle on another is almost nil.
One crucial point is that the particles are all in motion (air molecules or molecules suspended in water), a little more precise than "want to expand" is that the molecules collide with each other. The closer the molecules are packed the more collisions and the more they bounce away from one another, thus "spreading out".
 
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
Newton's law of gravity has nothing to do with this- the gravitational pull of one small particle on another is almost nil.
One crucial point is that the particles are all in motion (air molecules or molecules suspended in water), a little more precise than "want to expand" is that the molecules collide with each other. The closer the molecules are packed the more collisions and the more they bounce away from one another, thus "spreading out".

If the force of such small particles upon each other is negligable:

1.) At what approx. mass does gravity take precedence over diffusion?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K