Dimensions and Degrees of Freedom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of dimensions in relation to motion and acceleration, specifically questioning whether a fourth dimension is necessary to account for the ability to accelerate in three-dimensional space. Participants explore the implications of acceleration and the nature of time as a dimension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the ability to accelerate implies the existence of a fourth dimension, suggesting that acceleration may require an additional axis beyond the three spatial dimensions.
  • Another participant clarifies that acceleration and velocity are not dimensions, emphasizing that they are derived from motion within a defined coordinate system.
  • A later reply acknowledges the initial misunderstanding and reiterates the inquiry about whether a fourth dimension is necessary for acceleration, rather than claiming acceleration itself is a dimension.
  • One participant proposes that time could be considered the fourth dimension, stating that motion cannot occur without time.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the necessity of a physical fourth dimension to accommodate the degrees of freedom experienced in motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a fourth dimension for acceleration. While some suggest time as a fourth dimension, others question whether a physical dimension is required, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the nature of dimensions related to motion and acceleration, and there are unresolved interpretations of what constitutes a dimension in this context.

Jimmy
Messages
771
Reaction score
38
When considering the three dimensions of space and our freedom of movement in that space, does our ability to change our state of motion (acceleration) imply an existence of a fourth dimension, ie. four space-time dimensions?

Given three dimensions each mutually perpendicular, we can move up, down, left, right, forward and backward. We can also rotate around each axes. Is a fourth axes perpendicular to the other three necessary for going faster and slower?

I know it's often debated whether time is really a physical dimension or just an abstraction. I also know that with regard to 4-D space-time, time isn't a dimension separate from the other three in an absolute sense; it depends on your orientation within space-time.

To summarize my question: is a fourth dimension implicit by the fact that we can accelerate and would it be possible to change the motion of any object without this dimension?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings Jimmy !

Acceleration is not a dimension, and velocity is
not a dimension either. When you describe a body
in a 3D space (normal Cartesian coordinates' systems)
you "break up" its location into the three axes
which you define (as you please). Velocity is then
the change in distance per unit of time relative
to the coordiante system you defined. You can also
"break" it up into velocity along each axis you define.
Acceleration is the change in velocity per unit of time.
So, if relative to your system I were moving along the
X axis my location would be my distance from the
center of your system (presumably - you), my velocity
would be the extra feet I move per second (for example),
and my acceleration would discribe by how much my velocity
changes from one second to the next.

BTW, that face looks awfully green, maybe you should cure it.

Live long and prosper.
 


Originally posted by drag
Greetings Jimmy !

Acceleration is not a dimension, and velocity is
not a dimension either...

Live long and prosper.

I understand what you are saying but I didn't suggest that velocity or acceleration were dimensions. I was asking if acceleration required another physical dimension along with the three dimensions of space. I was considering the fact that given three dimensions, we have certain degrees of freedom with regard to motion. I was curious if a fourth dimension was required to allow us the added degree of freedom, ie. acceleration.

Thanks for your reply. :smile:
 
Last edited:
i suppose that "fourth dimension" would be time as there is no motion without time

just a thought ;)
 
drag: BTW, that face looks awfully green, maybe you should cure it.

Live long and prosper.

Yeah, good old Mr. Yuck. Lots of poison control centers in the US give out stickers of Mr. Yuck for parents to put on anything dangerous. I remember when I was younger, I saw lots of public service announcements from the West Virgina Poison control center which featured Mr. Yuck and warned children not to touch anything that had his face on it.

If I chose a better avatar, I might get more responses.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Ace Nova
i suppose that "fourth dimension" would be time as there is no motion without time

just a thought ;)

That's the general consensus. What I'm asking is, is a fourth, 'Physical' dimension necessary to accommodate all the degrees of freedom that we experience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K