Protien as genetic inheritance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jikx
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the historical misconception that proteins were the primary carriers of genetic inheritance, a belief that was prevalent before the discovery of DNA's role. It highlights that the diversity of the 20 amino acids led scientists to favor proteins over DNA, which only consists of four bases. However, experiments involving radioactively labeled amino acids demonstrated that proteins do not serve as genetic material, as they were not detected within infected cells. The conversation also references Watson and Crick's contributions to understanding DNA's structure and its significance in genetics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic genetic concepts, particularly the roles of DNA and proteins.
  • Familiarity with the structure and function of amino acids and nucleotides.
  • Knowledge of historical scientific theories regarding heredity and genetic material.
  • Awareness of key experiments in molecular biology, such as viral infection studies.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of genetic inheritance theories, focusing on the transition from protein to DNA as genetic material.
  • Study the experiments conducted by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase that demonstrated DNA as the genetic material.
  • Explore the contributions of Watson and Crick to molecular biology, particularly their discovery of the double helix structure of DNA.
  • Investigate the implications of amino acid diversity in protein function and its relevance to phenotypic variation.
USEFUL FOR

Students of genetics, molecular biologists, and anyone interested in the evolution of scientific understanding regarding heredity and genetic material.

Jikx
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to think of a nice topic to do for an essay, it has to be something that was believed to be true, but was proven to be something else due to scientific advances.

I want to do something a bit different from the usual darwin theory / Newton laws. I heard that it was once believed that proteins held the key to inhertitable traits? Anyone have any info on that? Thoughts appreciated.


thanks..
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Thats actually a really good topic. (Other possible suggestions for topics could be about Phlogiston (old explanation for combustion), or Caloric Fluid (explanation for heat))

As for the proteins as Genetic material, I believe it was the more favoured option over DNA for a long time because the 20 Amino Acids showed the right sort of diversity expected of something like Genetic material. DNA had only 4 bases, and that seemed to small an amount of variety to result in the huge range of phenotypic differences we see.

I know that it can be proven that Proteins aren't the genetic material by radioactivly labelling the amino acids used by a virus to make its proteins, and then allowing one such radioactively labeled virus to infect a cell. Since the virus infects the cell by injecting its genetic material, if proteins were that material, then the radioactively labels should be visible inside the cell. They are not.

Thats my off the head knowledge of the topic. I think Watson or Crick wrote a book about what happened around their discovery of the DOuble Helix structure of DNA, and maybe they go into some back ground history of how why when etc which led up to the victory by DNA...?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K