Predicting Everything with Hypothetical Scanner

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter josh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of a hypothetical scanner capable of detecting subatomic particles, specifically focusing on the concept of predicting future events based on atomic-level data. The conversation references Isaac Newton's deterministic view of the universe, contrasting it with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle from Quantum Mechanics, which asserts that precise measurements of position and momentum cannot coexist. The implications of these principles suggest that while a comprehensive scan could gather vast amounts of data, the inherent uncertainties of quantum mechanics would limit the ability to make definitive predictions about future states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics, particularly the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with deterministic theories in physics, such as those proposed by Isaac Newton
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and subatomic particles
  • Basic principles of wavefunction collapse in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its implications for measurement in quantum mechanics
  • Explore deterministic theories in physics and their evolution with the advent of quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of wavefunction collapse and its role in quantum predictions
  • Examine the theoretical frameworks for hypothetical scanning technologies at the atomic level
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of determinism versus uncertainty in the universe.

josh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If hypotheticaly speaking you bult a scaner that could scan an enclosed and secure are and the scaner could scan everything down to the smallest atom couldn't it predict exactoly what will happen and when the reason
I am posting it here is because the scaner would have to be able to detect the Gaonoes I think they are called that are in the atoms and there are even smaller and exetera but if you could and then expand the area the scan could do to citys states countrys planets you could predict everything and everything that will happen and when it could tell tou when the universe started and ends and everything else like how black wholes work with all the info it would have gathered
I think that it sucks everytrhing around it into a submicroscopic level and once all the black wholes combine and there is nothing left to suck in all the super condesed matter would all chemicaly react in one blast thus my BIG BANG THiery

hope you have some interesting things to say by the way I am 15 yeaaaay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gee, that sure is a long sentence. You might consider a period here and there...

Well, Isaac Newton believed in a 'clock-work' universe which is deterministic. He believed that it was possible to know the future of the universe if one knew the position and the velocity of everything in the universe. He wasn't aware of the implications of Quantum Mechanics, however.

A fundamental principle of QM is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Basically, this states that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrarily high precision.

According to this principle, the more you know about a particles momentum and velocity, the less you can know about where it is.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
 
Also one of the other fundamental aspects of Quantum Mechanics is once an isolated system has been measured by someone, the wavefunction describing all the states collapses to that corresponding to the state that has been measured. A short time after this the wavefunction is then restored to its earlier format making any predictions of properties later on mere probabilities of all possible outcomes. Thus, the original measurement becomes obsolete for the purpose of predicting future properties.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K