Anti-gravity High Schoolers demonstrate aircraft

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mouseonmoon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Anti-gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a group of high school students who claim to have built an anti-gravity aircraft that operates without traditional propulsion methods. The conversation explores the underlying theories, experimental results, and historical context related to the concept of anti-gravity and ion propulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the aircraft as utilizing ion waves, where ions interact with oxygen to create lift, referencing Newton's third law of motion.
  • Others mention two theories being researched: Ion Wind Theory and the Befield Brown Effect, with varying interpretations of how they might work.
  • One participant questions the validity of the claim that the aircraft can operate in a vacuum, citing a Purdue University experiment that reportedly showed no thrust in such conditions.
  • Another participant notes that the vacuum test was not reproducible and suggests that the thrust observed was likely dependent on environmental pressure, implying potential equipment faults.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the cost of constructing the aircraft, suggesting it could be made for much less than the reported $200.
  • Historical context is provided by referencing the "ionocraft" concept from the 1960s, with a suggestion that the current project is not a new idea and has been explored previously.
  • Links to additional resources and safety warnings regarding high-voltage power supplies for similar projects are shared, indicating interest in practical experimentation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of skepticism and curiosity regarding the claims made by the students. There is no consensus on the validity of the anti-gravity claims, with multiple competing views and unresolved questions about the experimental results and theoretical underpinnings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of reproducibility in vacuum tests, dependence on specific experimental conditions, and unresolved questions about the theoretical models being discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in experimental physics, ion propulsion technology, or the historical development of anti-gravity concepts may find this discussion relevant.

mouseonmoon
http://www.detnews.com/2002/schools/0212/03/c03-24756.htm
Detroit News-Darren Jacobs

"Dearborn High School students Ethan Rein, Jim Bergren and Luke Duncan are breaking the law -- of gravity.
___Rein, a senior, and juniors Bergren and Duncan, have built an anti-gravity aircraft that hovers without the aid of a motor, fan or engine. ..."

"... and cost about $200 to construct. The aircraft is triangular shaped and gets its power from a wire that runs along the top of the device. The wire is connected to a power source, which can be anything from a battery to a desktop computer.
___The secret of the craft lies in a theory on the function of ion waves. The ions bump into oxygen, causing the craft to rise up, according to the students. "

Anti-gravity Kids
from their website:
Specifications
* 18 Grams
* approximatly 40,000 Volts @ 1 milliamp
* made of balsa wood
* aluminum foil
* no moving parts
(sounds like stuff from Roswell?)

"There are a few different theories that we are researching ...
1.Ion Wind Theory
2.Befield Brown Effect

1.Ions jump from the wire at the top of the craft to the foil at the bottom of the craft pushing air and moving the craft. This theory is based on Netwons third law that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

2.Objects have a tendency to move from a negative charge to a positive charge. When the top wire is charged positively the craft moves in the direction of the wire."

However-I have in my notes this:"They thought an ion wind might be causing the machine to rise up into the air, but an experiment at Purdue University put a similar craft into a vacuum tube and the machine still flew. If it had been powered by ion winds, this wouldn’t have happened."; which isn't in this article...
So what's going on?
Leak from Fermi labs?
Boeing,Boeing, Bong...

afriad I've 'lost' reference links to other notes---so , you'll have to do your own research for now-
oh, maybe from the interviews with 'em... ((:interview : http://www.wdhsvideo.org/html/antigravity/antigravity_press.htm

But from the report here, what i don't believe is that it cost 200 bucks!
come on, some balsa wood,aluminium foil, duck tape ,glue, wires,batteries;
give me a break-i'd pay 'em 50 $ to clean out my garage and they'd get this stuff for free!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This has been addressed before.

The vacuum test was not reproducible. In tests under laboratory conditions, the thrust was found to be related to the pressure of the environment, and there was no thrust in a true vacuum. Most likely their equipment was faulty. To think about it, it wouldn't make sense either, since gravity is based on mass attraction, which is irrelevant in such a drive system.

So sadly no anti-gravity. But still very cool.

The secret of the craft lies in a theory on the function of ion waves. The ions bump into oxygen, causing the craft to rise up, according to the students. "
Uh... hmm.

2.Objects have a tendency to move from a negative charge to a positive charge. When the top wire is charged positively the craft moves in the direction of the wire."
This sounds rather dubious. Seems a version of "pulling yourself off the ground."
 
Originally posted by FZ+


The vacuum test was not reproducible.

was this from Purdue tests?
do you happen to have link-not sure how to narrow search down to this particular 'experiment'--seems they would have posted more by now?

i'd love to try this--not enough info as to where they got the idea?
"they didn't think it would work"---suggests they weren't the originators of the 'idea' --Purdue first?

thanks FZ+
 
This is the "ionocraft" invented quite some time ago. Here is a link to an article in Popular Mechanics from the 1960s that gives history and a good, clear explanation of how it works. Operation in a vacuum is not possible. They had high hopes for it as you will see from the article, but I don't believe anyone ever overcame the need for the tether. a lot of hobbyists make them nowadays, calling them "lifters". They are quite simple and should not cost 200 dollars.

Here's the link:

Major DeSeversky: Ionocraft (Popular Mechanics, August 1964) ~ Ion wind propelled aircraft
Address:http://www.rexresearch.com/desev/desev.htm
 
Below is a website that has quite a lot of interesting links on the subject:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

EDIT: If you want to make one I found an article on how to make a cheap power supply: Don't blame me if you get fried!
so I had to blow on it to get it started

Lifter Power SupplyHigh Voltage power supply for the T.T.Brown Lifter
English translation courtesy of Mike Ady )
Greetings to you!

Have a happy New Year, "without gravity"

I have enclosed an explanatory document on how to use the high voltage
from a monitor to supply power to a Lifter.

Be cautious around high voltage!
Share your experiences.

Cordial greetings,
Claude Dupré

Some advices for providing power to a Lifter :

It is very simple to obtain high voltage from a monitor, but it is
necessary to take certain precautions. The total power delivered by the HV
circuit of a monitor is not fatal, but the human heart does not appreciate
such a shock. Therefore it is safer to place two holes in the monitor and
close the cover before using... It is also a good idea to affix a label
marked "DANGER HIGH VOLTAGE"

1) Make sure that the monitor delivers at least 25KV at 20W (see plate)
2) Remove the rear cover of the monitor
3) The - : this is the braid or mount that surrounds the picture tube
4) The + : this is the rubber nipple that attaches to the picture tube. [
Squeeze the rubber nipple with your fingers or a pair of pliers to remove
it from the picture tube. Make sure the monitor has been turned off for
at least a day before attempting this.]
5) Make 2 notches on opposite sides of the cover... one on the left and
the other on the right, (10 mm x 5 mm) about 10 cm from the bottom, at the
junction of the cover in back and screen in front.
6) Solder two 2 m [7'] pieces of well insulated wire to the braid (-)
surrounding the picture tube, and run them out one of the notches. [These
will be the ground wires.] Here the wire diameter is not critical... 0.1
or 0.2 mm [38 or 32 AWG] is fine.
7) Run the wire with the rubber nipple (+) out the other side.
8) Close the cover, making sure the wires run through the notches on
either side
9) The wire can simply rest on the work surface.
10) Cut and strip the wire (+), 5 cm from the rubber nipple and put a 250
K Ohm 3W power resistor (or equivalent) in line, (to avoid frying the HV
circuitry in case of a short circuit).
11) Insulate the wires and resistor(s) with 4 or 5 layers of orange Scotch
tape of the type used to install fibreglas insulation.
12) Attach the rubber nipple to a very stable support, raising it to a
height of 50 cm. (I used a bottle filled with sand and a length of 16 mm
PVC electric insulation tube [plastic electrical conduit])
13) Make a 80x80 cm work surface for flying the Lifter, using white
[surfaced] chipboard, 15 to 22 mm [1/2" to 3/4"] thick (make sure the wood
is dry, not damp)
14) Strip (3 mm) of insulation from the end of one of the ground wires (-)
and tin it [with solder]. Tape it to one of the sides of the work surface.

15) The end of the other ground wire (-) is to be connected to a well
isolated discharge probe, which is to be kept away from all other
conductors, objects or humans (it will serve to discharge the high voltage
after each use).
16) Strip the end of this wire (-) and solder it to the end of 70 cm
length of 0.1 mm [38 AWG] insulated copper magnet wire. Remove 2 cm of
insulation from the other end of the wire. This end is to be taped to the
aluminum plate of the Lifter using ordinary Scotch tape.
17) The elevated rubber nipple is to be placed on the opposite side of the
work surface (30 cm)
18) Solder a 70 cm length of 0.1 mm [38 AWG] enameled copper magnet wire
to the electrode inside the rubber nipple. The other end is to be
soldered to the Lifter corona wire.
19) Before testing, remove everything from the table and the work surface.
21) Provide switched (mains) power to the monitor. It is important to be
able to turn off the power while remaining at least 1 m [3'] from the high
voltage.
22) The test location must not be humid
23) Make sure casual observers are kept back a minimum of 3 m [10'].
24) Launch!
25) After switching off the power to the monitor, always discharge the
high voltage with discharge probe (-) by placing it in contact with the
electrode inside the rubber nipple (+). Never touch the Lifter before
discharging the high voltage.
26) Enjoy, but Keep safe.
BE CAREFUL, USE EXTREME CAUTION !, this device use High Voltage,
ALWAYS switch off the input and discharge the output to the ground
through 10k/2W resistor before touch it. These plans are not
intended for the inexperienced. User of this document should be very
carefull and experienced in High-Voltage electronics to try anything
out ! If you do it the risk of any results is just yours. I take no
responsibility of anything that might happen.




Go to the J.Naudin Lifters experiments page
Go to the AdeOne-KonAde Lifter Build page
Go to the AdeOne-KonAde Lifter page
 
Last edited:
zoobyshoe and username

thanks!

loved the PMec article-and great site! awesome-
i have a PMec from '70 with 'Back Pack Helicopter' cover

The FUTURE is NOW! why am i still stuck in traffic?

might be interesting to start a thread of '10 favorite websites '
that's a great one!

funny- kids didn't mention the 'monitor' and high voltage,
or the reporter-i was wondering why this wasn't a 'popular toy'

over the holidaze saw Letterman playing with a remote controlled
"Flying Saucer"--rreally cool-only 39 $--it was basicly a 'horizontal'
propeller inside an open 'cage'...hovered and flew around, very quick,
don't remember the 'exact' name-haven't 'found one' yet...

thanks again folks
happy flying!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
27K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K