Can a Machine Invention Lead Us to True AI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential implications of a machine invention, specifically a Creativity Machine and Self-Training Neural Network, on the development of true artificial intelligence (AI). Participants explore various perspectives on the nature of AI, the concept of the singularity, and the societal impacts of advanced neural networks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a Creativity Machine that simulates human brain functions, questioning the implications of such technology.
  • There is speculation about the timeline for the singularity, with one participant moving their estimate to before 2050.
  • Some argue that it is inevitable for computers to surpass human intelligence, citing their current advantages in processing power.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical treatment of neural networks, suggesting a need for a 'computer rights society'.
  • Participants discuss the potential for advanced neural networks to create challenging adversaries in games, proposing models that incorporate memory and decision-making capabilities.
  • There is a mix of optimism and skepticism regarding the significance of recent advancements in AI technology, with some expressing excitement while others remain cautious.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of AI advancements, with no consensus on whether these developments are ultimately beneficial or detrimental. The timeline for the singularity and the nature of AI's evolution are also points of contention.

Contextual Notes

Participants' claims are based on varying assumptions about the capabilities of AI and the ethical considerations surrounding its development. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of technological advancements and their potential consequences.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the future of artificial intelligence, ethical considerations in technology, and the philosophical implications of machine learning and neural networks.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
All men go to good Earth in one eternal silent night

His first patent was for a Device for the Autonomous Generation of Useful Information," the official name of the Creativity Machine, Miller said. "His second patent was for the Self-Training Neural Network Object. Patent Number Two was invented by Patent Number One.



http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/News/Science+&+Medicine/E981DA33F2CF718986256E250061FFF6?OpenDocument&Headline=Computer+Creativity+Machine+simulates+the+human+brain
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
quote
Its foundation is the discovery that great ideas are the result of noisy neurons and faulty memories.
========

how'd he get a patent on my brain?---

oh, could be "W's"
(that Bush is quite an 'inventor' -for sure)

(but who knows what 'virus' lies dormant
in the Mad CowBoy brain...)

something to chew on...

lotta food for thought--quite a meal

scary...

this guy's like the Tesla of neural-networks.

love it- don't touch that coil!
 
I just moved up my estimate of the singularity by ten years. Before 2050 now.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
I just moved up my estimate of the singularity by ten years. Before 2050 now.

Do you think this will be a good thing or a bad thing?
 
It is only a matter of time before computers are "smarter" than humans They already beat us with shear brute force.

I for one embrace our AI overloards.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
I just moved up my estimate of the singularity by ten years. Before 2050 now.
What? The denominator is approaching zero??

- Warren
 
Originally posted by dduardo
It is only a matter of time before computers are "smarter" than humans They already beat us with shear brute force.

I for one embrace our AI overloards.

don't care for the cockroach models...
but the Pamela Anderson models, all right!

i think i dreamed about this 'article' last night

seriously-can't get it out of my mind...
 
Name

Did this Steven Thaler ask his machine what its name was?
CJ
 
So this just reinforces my point that I'm not crazy, just overly creative!
 
  • #10
Sounds like a need for the birth of a 'computer rights society', to protect neural networks from being mistreated in an inhumain way. lol
 
  • #11
These could be quite usefull,
Just imagine a game, where your adversaries can learn and grow.
Make a 'Deciding' Neural net, which decides which cource of action is the correct one (FSM, in a ches game a minimax tree)
And give the second neural net a 'memory' (link outputs to inputs),
And it would be a verry hard opponant.
 
  • #12
WOW!

That's about all I can say.

WOW!

Is this a huge as it seems to me, or am I just being overly optimistic and taken by the romance of someone stumbling upon the key to true AI and analogesque digital brains?
 
  • #13
Originally posted by one_raven
WOW!

That's about all I can say.

WOW!

Is this a huge as it seems to me, or am I just being overly optimistic and taken by the romance of someone stumbling upon the key to true AI and analogesque digital brains?
It does appear to me to be that huge: which of course is why I am skeptical.
 

Similar threads

Current and Future AI Threats to Humanity and the Human Response
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Unknown Human Group Bone Found in Siberia: New Species?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Do Movies Teach Us Realistic Life Skills?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K