Can particles with identical spin have the same spin projection onto an axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomkeus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving two particles with spin s=1 and their total state |S=2,M=1>. The original poster is trying to determine the probability that both particles yield the same spin projection when measured along a specific axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reformulate the problem in terms of the spin difference operator and questions the validity of their reasoning regarding the probability of obtaining the same spin projection. They also inquire whether it is indeed impossible for two particles of identical spin to have the same spin projections.

Discussion Status

Some participants have raised concerns about the categorization of the thread and the original poster's reasoning. There is a suggestion that the answer to the second question may be "no," referencing Bose statistics, which allows multiple particles to occupy the same spin state. However, the discussion remains open with no clear consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a previous solution provided by a teaching assistant that the original poster finds difficult to understand. Additionally, the original poster expresses concern about potential mistakes in their reasoning, particularly regarding the spin projection difference operator.

tomkeus
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I'm preparing my QM exam (problem part) and I have stumbled upon one I can't quite "digest" properly. It goes like this

Two particles with spin s=1 are given and in total state [tex]|S=2,M=1>[/tex]. What is probability that by simultaneous measurement of both particle's spin projections onto some axis we obtain same result?

Back on exercise classes few years ago TA gave some ridiculoulsy large solution I'm reading now and I don't understand it completely. I thought of next. Problem's question is equivalent to next (I hope): What is probability that by measuring difference between particle's spin projections onto some axis we obtain zero as a result? We first set up spin difference operator[tex]\hat{s}_{diff}=\hat{s}_1\otimes\hat{I}_2-\hat{I}_1\otimes\hat{s}_2[/tex] (it has propper eigenvaules [tex]s_1-s_2[/tex] and gives orthogonal decomposition of total state space so I guess it is spin difference operator). Probability asked for is [tex]v=<2,1|\hat{P}_0|2,1>[/tex], where [tex]\hat{P}_0[/tex] projects to spin difference operator's subspace of eigenvalue 0. Now I represent it in noncorrelated basis [tex]|s_1,m_1>\otimes|s_2,m_2>[/tex]. Since both particles have same spin, they will be represented by same matrices in this basis. As a consequence, spin difference operator will be zero (in any basis) and accordingly, I suppose, all projectors in it's subspaces will be zero. Hence probability is zero (this is same result TA got). Now, this reasoning would hold for any particles of identical spin.

Q1: Is my solution OK?

Q2: Does this mean that it is actually impossible for two particles of identical spin to have same spin projections onto some axis?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Still no reply? Well anyway...

First: What worries me is that no one noticed I made a mistake (or someone noticed and decided not to post). Spin projection difference operator is not zero (contribution of nonocommutativity of Kronecker product). I will try to get around this.

Second: Q2 still remains
 
Doesn't this belong in the "homework" category?
 
Of course the answer to Q2 is "no", Bose statistics allow as many as you like in the same spin state.

By the way, I'm sort of surprised this didn't get sent over to the homework section.

Carl
 
S=2 implies 5 total angular momentum states. Count how many can have the same m or sz components, and you have a good start. My guess is that with careful counting you can avoid Clebsch-Gordon coefficients or a Gram-Schmidt procedure.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K