Recycling Atoms: A Skeptical Inquiry

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shetland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Recycling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the claim that each person contains atoms that were once part of other humans, as mentioned in Bill Bryson's book. Participants explore the implications of this idea, particularly in relation to the recycling of atoms in the atmosphere and the nature of identity associated with these atoms. The conversation touches on scientific concepts, historical figures, and the philosophical implications of shared atomic existence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the claim about having atoms from historical figures like Shakespeare is plausible, suggesting it relates to the dynamic nature of the atmosphere and gas exchange.
  • Others mention the idea that many people may have inhaled the same atoms as significant historical figures, raising questions about the implications of this shared existence.
  • A participant challenges the notion of atoms being "alive," suggesting that the assembly of atoms into complex structures leads to emergent properties, but does not imply a soul.
  • Concerns are raised about the calculation methods behind Bryson's claim, with one participant questioning how the figure of a billion atoms is derived and whether it includes more than just gaseous exchange.
  • Another participant discusses the "Caesar's breath" calculations, indicating that while the probability of inhaling atoms from historical figures is reasonable, distinguishing individual atoms is not feasible.
  • There is speculation about whether Bryson's claim includes atoms from water and other materials, not just gases, which complicates the understanding of atomic recycling.
  • Participants express a desire to explore the calculations and reasoning behind the claims, suggesting it could be an interesting exercise to estimate the number of atoms shared with others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of Bryson's claim or the methods used to calculate the number of shared atoms. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the implications and calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the definitions of "atoms" in the context of the discussion, the assumptions made about gas exchange versus other forms of atomic recycling, and the unresolved mathematical steps in deriving the figure of a billion atoms.

shetland
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Also posted in skepticism forum:

Hey everyone,

Currently reading a new book by Bill Bryson, "A short history of nearly everything".

Well, despite the title, clearly even a short history would be a very, very big book, still the read is quite addicting, and there are many scientific areas to which I was quite unfamiliar (Geophysics, Geology for example - Yellowstone is a big volcano!).

There was one instance in the book, that gave me considerable pause - the author "states" that each one of us has up to a billion atoms that were once other humans, those who lived long ago. A specific example used was Shakespeare.

At first glance, I thought, well, yeah, a billion atoms is an infinitesimal number that actually comprise us - and I'm assuming what they are referring to is oxygen/gas that people inhaled & exhaled.

The little know about how dynamic the atmosphere is, not only with oxygen, nitrogen, but even carbon particulates, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that very quickly these become homogeneously distributed throughout the biosphere.

I mentioned this little kernel to a friend, and they asked me if I was a member of a new religion! That this was time-worn cliche, not worthy of the effort to speak it.

The little googling I did, I came up with a book by Harlow Shapley, "Beyond the Observatory", which delineates the journeys of the inert gas argon. We take in like 3x10^19 atoms in every breath, and in one week these atoms are already distributed through the country. And so on...

Anyone have a little more ammunition, er, I mean info, that I might use to supplant my argument?

Shelley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have heard of a similar situation, though probably not from the source you cited, as I have not read that book.
In any event, but NOT to get into religion, I hear that many of us has breathed in some of the exact same atoms that Jesus breathed in and exhaled. "Touched by Jesus" taking on a new meaning?
And I suppose that might also be true with regards to Hitler's exhaled air.
 
Originally posted by pallidin
I have heard of a similar situation, though probably not from the source you cited, as I have not read that book.
In any event, but NOT to get into religion, I hear that many of us has breathed in some of the exact same atoms that Jesus breathed in and exhaled. "Touched by Jesus" taking on a new meaning?
And I suppose that might also be true with regards to Hitler's exhaled air.

I think the "new religion" comment to me was meant sarcastically, implying that idea had no merit. Frankly, I don't see any religious connotation; at most, it speaks to the issue that atoms are not "alive", alive in the sense we consider ourselves, :smile: , but that when we bring together a certain assembly of said atoms, bingo!. Ok, not exactly bingo, but perhaps some emergent state occurs - note, I am not suggesting a soul, merely musing why a rock *might* be different from a organic living thing.

Shelley
 
When you start talking about things as small as atoms, then your in the identical particle arena of phenomena. In that case, it almost doesn't make sense to say that this H atom is the same as that H atom. Or, rather, it makes sense in the same way that the water on one side of the pool is the same water as the water on the other side of the pool, which is kind of trivial.
 
Originally posted by shetland
*SNIP There was one instance in the book, that gave me considerable pause - the author "states" that each one of us has up to a billion atoms that were once other humans, those who lived long ago. A specific example used was Shakespeare.

At first glance, I thought, well, yeah, a billion atoms is an infinitesimal number that actually comprise us - and I'm assuming what they are referring to is oxygen/gas that people inhaled & exhaled.

The little know about how dynamic the atmosphere is, not only with oxygen, nitrogen, but even carbon particulates, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that very quickly these become homogeneously distributed throughout the biosphere.

I mentioned this little kernel to a friend, and they asked me if I was a member of a new religion! That this was time-worn cliche, not worthy of the effort to speak it.

The little googling I did, I came up with a book by Harlow Shapley, "Beyond the Observatory", which delineates the journeys of the inert gas argon. We take in like 3x10^19 atoms in every breath, and in one week these atoms are already distributed through the country. And so on...

Anyone have a little more ammunition, er, I mean info, that I might use to supplant my argument?
What, exactly, are you looking for? Do you want an outline of the kind of calculation that leads to Bryson's conclusion? For just C, or O, N, H, etc? Or a general description of the processes which lead to the fact that there is a small part of every human who ever lived in you, right now? (almost ditto, for every trilobite which swam in the Cambrian oceans?)
 


Originally posted by Nereid
What, exactly, are you looking for? Do you want an outline of the kind of calculation that leads to Bryson's conclusion? For just C, or O, N, H, etc? Or a general description of the processes which lead to the fact that there is a small part of every human who ever lived in you, right now? (almost ditto, for every trilobite which swam in the Cambrian oceans?)

As you probably know, typical "Caesar breath" calculations show that in each breath we take, there is a large probability that at least one atom is one that Caesar shared.
I have looked at the math here, and find it fairly reasonable - though being able to distinguish between anyone particular atom is not allowable - so were only talking probabilities, right?

What I'm wondering, is how bryson manages to calculate (or more accurately, parrot some other finding) that each of us has up to a billion atoms that once were part of others. If he is talking gas, and we can only count on acquiring 1 atom per breath, it would take nearly a lifetime to get a billion of them (approx). So, I wonder if he meant more than gas, perhaps that our cells being made up mostly of h2O, and since water is also heavily recycled, this is what he refers to?

In the past, the only time recycling was calculated, it was with gas. I guess with gas, using ideal gas notions, we can better calculate the equilibrium & dynamics, in order to arrive at the reasonable proposition of the makeup of each breath. I would think any comparable analysis with other materials, i.e., water, would be far more difficult, perhaps unknowable?

thanks for your time here,

Shelley
 
shetland wrote: What I'm wondering, is how bryson manages to calculate (or more accurately, parrot some other finding) that each of us has up to a billion atoms that once were part of others. If he is talking gas, and we can only count on acquiring 1 atom per breath, it would take nearly a lifetime to get a billion of them (approx). So, I wonder if he meant more than gas, perhaps that our cells being made up mostly of h2O, and since water is also heavily recycled, this is what he refers to?
If he didn't say, and he didn't quote his source, I guess we'll just have to make something up, won't we :wink:

Sounds like an interesting exercise - if we follow the same sort of reasoning about Caeser's breath, we can see if we can come up with a number that's within an OOM (order of magnitude) of 1 billion.

Just for fun then: if we absorb one atom from Caeser every day (assume it takes that many breaths before we get one atom that was part of Caeser to become part of us, e.g. a bone in my finger), then how many people's breath have I breathed in that day? Depends on how you do the 'Caeser's breath' calculation, but let's say it's ~1 billion. Voila!

We can deal with the 'up to' by saying that some of the atoms have come from many people

We could have all kinds of fun with metabolising the C in CO2, the H in H2O, etc; we could even go crazy over what we eat
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K