Ground state energy of free electron fermi gas

Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
Can someone explain to me why the ground state energy of a free electron fermi gas is not just:

<br /> E = 2 \int_0^{k_f} \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} 3k^2 dk<br />

Where the factor of two is due to the fact that there are two electron states for each value of k. The idea is to add up all the energies of all states within the fermi sphere, but it does not give the correct result which is:

<br /> E = \frac{3}{5} N k_f<br />

Where N is the number of electrons, and k_f is the radius of the fermi sphere. What am I doing wrong? If you need more info please let me know.

Thanks in advance
René
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the integral defining N? (ie, the integral over the fermi sphere of dN)
 
There are a few things wrong with your formulas:

Your total energy integral should look like this:

<br /> <br /> E = 2 \int_0^{k_f} \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} 4 \pi k^2 dk<br /> <br />

The \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} is necessary because you need to account for the volume of k-space each state occupies. The 4\pi comes from converting the 3D integration in spherical coordinates into a 1D integration only in the radial direction (dk).

You'll see that you can also find the total particle number the same way, without the \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}:

<br /> <br /> N = 2 \int_0^{k_f} \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3} 4 \pi k^2 dk<br /> <br />

After performing the integrations, you can write E in terms of N, and you'll find that:

<br /> <br /> E = \frac{3}{5} N \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} (k_f)^2 = \frac{3}{5} N E_f<br /> <br />

Hope that helps.
 
Thanks very much for this solution.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top