Is Gravity a Substance or a Wave?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Thallium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravity, questioning whether it is a substance, a wave, or something else entirely. Participants explore theoretical perspectives, analogies, and the implications of gravity in the context of physics, including concepts from general relativity and quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gravity is best understood as a curvature of spacetime rather than a substance, using analogies like the "rubber sheet" to illustrate this concept.
  • Others argue that while gravity itself is not a wave, it can generate gravity waves, which are curvatures that propagate away from massive objects.
  • A participant introduces the concept of gravitons, suggesting they may play a role in gravity similar to how photons relate to light, although this remains unproven.
  • Another participant notes that the existence of gravitons is predicted by quantum field theory, but the application to gravity is complex and not yet verifiable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gravity, with some emphasizing its curvature in spacetime and others discussing the potential existence of gravitons. No consensus is reached regarding whether gravity should be classified as a substance or a wave.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to various theoretical frameworks, such as general relativity and quantum field theory, highlighting the complexities and unresolved aspects of gravity's nature.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in theoretical physics, gravity, and the interplay between general relativity and quantum mechanics may find this discussion relevant.

Thallium
Messages
231
Reaction score
0
What do we understand with gravity:

Is it a substance?
Is it a wave?
Is it alike to anything else that is physically comprehendable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to our best understanding, gravity is not a substance, but can be best understood if we treat spacetime as a substance, and gravity as a curvature of that substance. You have probably heard of the "rubber sheet" analogy, in which gravity is described by picturing a heavy object (like a bowling ball) set on a rubber sheet. The sheet bends under the weight of the ball, and that curve represents gravity. But this is only a visualisation of something that can't truly be seen or even pictured in the mind. The surface of the sheet normally has only two dimensions, but is now curved in a third direction. Similarly, space normally can be treeted as having three dimensions, but the presence of a massive object curves space in a fourth direction. In this way it can be said that gravity is not "physically comprehensible" to us three dimensional beings, but we can make annalogies that come reasonably close.

Also, you can see from the above description that gravity is not a wave. However, it is predicted by GR (and some empiricle data is starting to come in) that it is possible to make waves in gravity (called "gravity waves"). To understand this, it might be best to picture that same bowling ball sitting on a waterbed, rather than a rubber sheet. If we bounce the ball, or move it rapidly back-and-forth, it will send waves across the bed. These waves will be curvatures of the bed surface, just like the "gravity" indentation that sarounded the ball, but they will be moving outward away from the ball. So the original gravity curve is not a wave nor is it made of waves, but it can make waves and the waves will be made of curves. Gravity is not a radiating force, but gravity waves radiate out from their source.

That help any?
 
Last edited:
What about gravitons? The thing no one can prove but that is predicted to have similar roles in gravity as photons in light.
 
Originally posted by Link
What about gravitons? The thing no one can prove but that is predicted to have similar roles in gravity as photons in light.
In Standard Model, force fields are created by particle trade. Every force needs particle(s).
For Strong Nuclear Force, these particle are gluons.
For Weak Force they are W+, Z0 and W-.
For electromagnetism we have photons.
And it is predicted that for gravity, we'll need gravitons by Quantum Field Theory logic.
 
Yes that helped a lot! Thank you, LURCH! :wink:
 
Pick your favorite quantum gravity theory, and you might have a notion of graviton in there, but that's really outside of verifiable physics right now. Gravitons are expected to exist based on what happens for other forces in flat space quantum field theory, but the extrapolation to gravity is not trivial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K