Forces, Torques, and Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving forces, torques, and acceleration, specifically in the context of a pulley system with both a block on a table and a hanging block. The original poster seeks to analyze the system using two different methods: one based on forces and torques, and another using work and energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive equations based on Newton's Second Law and torque for the pulley, expressing uncertainty about the next steps in their reasoning.
  • Some participants question the assumptions regarding tension in the pulley and the direction of acceleration, suggesting a need for clarity in the free body diagrams.
  • Others explore the implications of friction as a nonconservative force in the context of the work-energy theorem, raising questions about how to account for energy changes in the system.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed with participants providing clarifications and additional equations related to the dynamics of the system. There is an ongoing exploration of both the force-based and energy-based approaches, with some guidance offered on how to set up the equations for analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of friction in the system, which complicates the application of conservation principles. There is also mention of specific variables and parameters related to the pulley and blocks, which may influence the analysis.

Arfrce8729
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi I have the following homework problem that I need to solve two times, one time using forces / torques / acceleration and again using work and energy. I have attached a diagram of the problem and the variables. Pertaining to the first method, I think the solution could be achieved by the following...

( The friction of the pulley is neglected, but the connecting strin does not slip )
( Angular acceleration will be represented by a<ANG> )

Starting from Newton's Second law,

F = m * a

The equations for the block on the table and the hanging block are as follows...
(T is the tension of the string)

<table block>

T - fk = m<table> * a

<hanging block>

T - m<hanging> * g = m<hanging> * a

The torque of the pulley is:
(I is the rotational inertia)

Torque<NET> = I * a<ANG>

which equates to:

-R * T = 1/2 * M<pulley>(r^2 + R^2) * a<ANG>

(R is negative because it's moving in a clockwise direction. I is rotational intertia of an annular cylinder)

To eliminate T, the net force equation for the table block is solved for T:

T = m<table> * a + coeff-kin * m<table> * g

I'm not really sure which direction to go after this, or if this is even correct. I think I need to substitute the above equation for T into the annular cylinder equation, but that doesn't look like it works out corectly. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance for any help.
 

Attachments

  • image1.jpg
    image1.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 421
Physics news on Phys.org
Since we're considering the dynamics of the pulley, the tension on either side of the pulley is not equal. You've got some things right, but I'm just going to start at the beginning:

Let's call the acceleration of the blocks a and say that a positive value for a involves the block on the table (m1) moving to the right. This means that a positive a also involves the hanging block (m2) moving down. We don't consider slip of the cable, so this means that the pulley must have an angular acceleration of &alpha; = a/R, where R is the outer diamater of the annular disk (pulley). Note that for positive a, &alpha; is counterclockwise. Keep these conventions in mind as we go through the free body diagrams:

From a FBD for m1:

[tex]T_1 - \mu m_1 g = m_1 a[/tex]

From a FBD for m2:

[tex]m_2g - T_2 = m_2a[/tex]

From a FBD of the pulley:

[tex](T_2 - T_1)R = I\frac a r = \frac{M_p(R^2+r^2)}{2}\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

I hope it is clear where these equations came from (if not, please ask). Mp is the mass of the pulley, and R and r are the outer and inner radii of the pulley, respectively.

There, you have 3 equations and three unknowns. Once you solve for a, you can use basic kinematics for constant acceleration motion to find the speed at the position given.

Post back if you need help with this or with the energy method solution.
 
Last edited:
Ah thanks a bunch. That makes everything a lot clearer. I think that I might need a little help for the solution using work and energy. Since friction, a nonconservative force, is present I can't use the conservation of mechanical energy in this problem right? Instead I would have to use

Work = Change in Total Energy = Change in Mechanical Energy + Change in Thermal Energy

possibly? But how does the pulley fit into this? Thanks...
 
You could use the work energy theorem. The work done on the system is equal to the change in total energy. Let's use the subscripts 1 and 2 to indicate the initial and final states of the system. We can also set the datum to be the initial height of m2.

So what's E1, the total initial energy of the system? Nothing is moving, so there's no kinetic energy. According to the datum we set, m1 does have some gravitational potential energy, but we know that that mass does not change height, so we can ignore that in this problem.

After the system has moved a distance d, all 3 moving objects have kinetic energy. The total kinetic energy is given by:

[tex]K_2 = \frac{m_1v_1^2}{2} + \frac{m_2v_2^2}{2} + \frac{I\omega^2}{2}[/tex]

(I is the inertia of the pulley) We know from the geometry of the system that v1 = v2 = &omega;R = v, the velocity we're solving for.

The final gravitational potential energy is -m2gd

So the work-energy theorem tells us that:

[tex]\frac{m_1v^2}{2} + \frac{m_2v^2}{2} + \frac{M_p(R^2+r^2)v^2}{4R^2} - m_2gd = -\mu m_1gd[/tex]

The right hand side of the equation is the work done by friction on the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K