Original Bell article with the proof of his inequality Is necessary.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the original paper by J.S. Bell published in 1964, which presents his inequality related to quantum mechanics. Participants express interest in understanding Bell's purpose for proving this inequality, questioning whether it serves to refute quantum mechanics. A link to a PDF version of the original paper is shared, although it is noted to be of poor quality. Additionally, the discussion references Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" as containing the same argument as Bell's original work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell's theorem and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of quantum entanglement and non-locality.
  • Knowledge of the historical context of quantum mechanics and its foundational debates.
  • Basic skills in accessing and interpreting academic papers in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read J.S. Bell's original paper titled "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox" (1964).
  • Study the implications of Bell's inequality on quantum mechanics and local realism.
  • Explore Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for a detailed explanation of Bell's arguments.
  • Investigate contemporary interpretations and experiments related to Bell's theorem.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory and Bell's inequalities.

Alexey
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Bell J.S. Physics. 1964,1,195.
Whether is not present at somebody?
Whether is it possible download it somewhere ?

There is interesting to my what purpose had Bell, proving an inequality. Is it to deny a quantum mechanics? I hope, that from this article it will be possible to gather the answers to these (and similar) questions.

My e-mail: lesha74@rambler.ru .
Thank.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks a lot, Dr.Chinese, for putting it up at your webpage...i got it from there...and the EPR and aspect papers too... through google search!

the original argument is there in Griffith( Intro. to Quantum Mechanics),though the paper as such is not there...the argument there is the same as in the original Bell's paper posted at your site
 

Similar threads

Graduate The experiment for testing the CHSH inequalities
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Undergrad Understanding Bell Inequality Proof: Explained from a Probability Perspective
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
Undergrad Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
9K
Graduate Does the Bell theorem assume reality?
  • · Replies 220 ·
8
Replies
220
Views
24K
High School The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Graduate Bell's Inequality - A misintepretation of probability?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
High School Some questions about "superdeterminism" and Bell's Theorem
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
13K
Graduate Do we have any proof of entanglement other than bells inequalities?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Hidden Assumptions in Bell's Theorem?
  • · Replies 333 ·
12
Replies
333
Views
21K