Object in a Time Field: What Would It Feel?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wimms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "time field" and its effects on a body floating within it, specifically focusing on how differences in time flow at different points of the body might influence its behavior and sensations. The scope includes theoretical exploration of time, movement, and the implications of time flow differences on physical objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that a body in a time field with varying time flow rates would feel a force due to the higher probability of interactions at the faster time flow end, suggesting a sensation akin to gravity.
  • Another participant questions how to approach the idea of movement caused by time flow differences using conventional tools, indicating uncertainty about the implications of such a scenario.
  • A different viewpoint introduces a "Law of the conservation of Time," claiming that any action directed at changing the time cycle leads to a corresponding compensation reluctance, which could explain various forces and phenomena.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the existence of unceasing time flow and challenges the notion of infinity in space and time, suggesting that these concepts lead to errors in understanding the universe and its behavior.
  • Another participant reflects on the implications of rejecting continuity in space and time, stating that they cannot discuss the behavior of an object in an ambience that they believe does not exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time and its effects on physical objects, with no consensus reached on the implications of time flow differences or the existence of continuity in time and space.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of time flow and its effects on matter, as well as the implications of rejecting continuity in space and time. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

wimms
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
Time field

Suppose body floats in a Time field, such that timeflow at the bottom of the body is 1% faster than at the top, or just simply, there is timeflow rate difference at opposite ends of the body. No other forces are affecting the body. Assume that this timerate difference is not caused by any force, but is inherent property of given space.

Q: what would that body "feel"?

Considering probabilities of interactions, or any conventional QM wisdom, is that sufficient to think that such body WILL feel any sort of force?

Inuitively me thinks body would tend to move towards faster time due to higher probability of interactions. Its rigid structure would be stretched. And that feels like gravity. If time field sustains same rate difference even for moving body, then it will continue to accelerate?

Now if such body enters space where timerate slows down sharply, it will have bottom timerate slower than top, but somewhere inside the body timerate faster than either edge. Sort of wave will reflect back from that new slowrate space, oscillating inside the body and stretching/compressing it until the wave relaxes between 2 edges.
Seems like collision of matter.

Now if body has equal timeflow at any edge, but faster timeflow in the center of it, would it tend to collapse towards its center, lumping?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Comeon, guys. no one will comment?
 
The TIME is INHERENT for ANY OBJECT i.e. its TIME CYCLE is SAVING CONSTANCY. Any ACTION, which is DIRECTED on CHANGE of the TIME CYCLE, does LEAD to a CORRESPONDING COMPENSATION RELUCTANCE.

This is My "Law of the conservation of Time".
It allows to explain all known and unknown yet a forces and phenomenas.
 
okay, this sounds sensible. But I'm at this point interested more in what body will feel. As you might see, I'm trying to realize if its enough to have timeflow difference to cause movement.
I'm not sure how one would approach this question with conventional tools.
 
Originally posted by wimms
okay, this sounds sensible. But I'm at this point interested more in what body will feel. As you might see, I'm trying to realize if its enough to have timeflow difference to cause movement.
I'm not sure how one would approach this question with conventional tools.
I do not think that the unceasing timflow exists . This will brings you to a notion "infinity of the space". People take this error as the truth, but this is illusion, is look like a reality only.
It is appropriately to say : " do not trust with eyes " here. On existing presentations, the Universe is an object having infinity space, though 10 billions years is passed from BB . If take into account, that "space enlarges at the speed of light" then not in a complicated way to find the radius of the sphere in which the universe exists. It is known and its value is not infinity. Then the intrigue question appears :
- that there is outside the sphere?
No answer to this question.
No, also, answer to a question:
- whence has been taken really an infinity energy in such universe?
This list it is possible to continue much long.
All this problems does not solved yet and all errors are due to this
"continuity of space and time".
I reject this continuity and infinity of a space, which does expands into nowhere. I reject continuity of timeflow. It has undefined "place" where does it flows.
Considering all said above, I can not discuss the behaviour (the feeling, if you want) of the object in the ambience, which does not exist.
My apologies, wimms.
I invite you participate on my topics. It is completely privy to Time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K