Is Hom(Lambda^k(V),Lambda^(k+1)(V)) and element of End(Lambda(V))?by precondition Tags: element, endlambdav, homlambdakv, lambdak 

#1
Dec2906, 10:36 PM

P: 57

Sorry I don't know how to write in symbols so I'm using Latex codes, anyway,
the question is as in title: Is an element of Hom(Lambda^k(V),Lambda^(k+1)(V)) and element of End(Lambda(V))? In words, is an element of the homomorphism between k th grade exterior algebra over V and k+1 th exterior algebra over V also an element of endomorphism of exterior algebra over vector space V? I appreciate your help 



#2
Dec2906, 11:33 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,101

What is the domain of an element of
Hom(Lambda^k(V),Lambda^(k+1)(V))? What is the domain of an element of End(Lambda(V))? Can a function have two different domains? 



#3
Dec3006, 04:44 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398

I'm afraid I'm going to disagree. Let n be the dimension of V. Then canonically
[tex] \Hom(\Lambda(V),\Lambda(V))= \oplus\Hom(\Lambda^r(V),\Lambda^s(V)[/tex] 0<=r,s<=n. Thus any element of the vector space Hom(\Lambda^k(V),\Lambda^{k+1}(V)) is canonically an element of End(\Lambda(V)). The question boils down to: if x is in X, is x also an element of X\oplus Y, and it is. I think the function notion is very misleading at times. 



#4
Dec3006, 05:09 AM

P: 57

Is Hom(Lambda^k(V),Lambda^(k+1)(V)) and element of End(Lambda(V))?
Yes I agree with what matt grime said,
When I carefully read the text again it said, "Let V>Hom(Lambda^kV, Lambda^(k+1)V) be the action of V on LambdaV" and since action of V on LambdaV is precisely the homomorphism between V and End(LambdaV) I can see that an element of Hom(Lambda^kV, Lambda^(k+1)V) is precisely an element of End(Lambda V) Thank you for your help anyways 



#5
Dec3006, 12:12 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,101

And there's a problem with this argument: it would also prove, for example, that every 1x1 real matrix is canonically an element of any group of mxn real matrices. I had also assumed End(\Lambda V) was the ring of algebra endomorphisms, not vector space endomorphisms. The canonical embedding you describe doesn't live in the subset of algebra endomorphisms. For any particular k, V>Hom(Lambda^kV, Lambda^(k+1)V) is the action of V on Lambda Vbut instead means The collection of all V>Hom(Lambda^kV, Lambda^(k+1)V) constitutes the action of V on Lambda Vwhich makes more sense, because to have an endomorphism of V, you have to know what happens to every Lambda^j V. (The canonical embedding matt describes for a particular k assumes the zero map on every j unequal to k) 



#6
Dec3006, 12:57 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398





#7
Dec3006, 01:11 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,101

[tex] (\mathbb{R}^m, \mathbb{R}^n) \cong \bigoplus_{\substack{1 \leq i \leq m \\ 1 \leq j \leq n}} ( \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R} ) [/tex] I guess my real point, though, is that it's an abuse of language to say "An element of X is an element of [itex]X \oplus Y[/itex]", since what we really mean is "we have an embedding [itex]X \mapsto X \oplus Y[/itex] which we will invoke implicitly as needed". Using an example with a repeated summand was just an indirect way to get at this. 



#8
Dec3006, 01:35 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398

I never have liked canonical. How are you picking out a summand, canonically? What if I change bases? I then change that decomposition. If you start writing down copies of R like that it stops being canonical in any meaningful sense. The fact is that a 2 dimensional real vector space is not canonically isomorphic to R\oplus R.
The decomposition of Lambda(V) does not depend on any choice of basis in V. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
De Broglie wave length, lambda=h/mv  Quantum Physics  4  
value of lambda  Cosmology  16  
Lambda QCD  General Physics  3  
lambda interacts with gravity to give expantion  Special & General Relativity  5 