A question from Landau's quantum mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the notation in Landau's "Quantum Mechanics," specifically regarding the commutator [H,f] = Hf - fH. In the classical limit, the first order term becomes zero because operators H and f commute, rendering HF negligible compared to the second order term, h[H,f]. The second order term is tied to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which relates the uncertainties in position and momentum, explaining the appearance of Planck's constant, h. This concept is also addressed in Dirac's mechanics, albeit without explicit mention of h due to different unit conventions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly commutation relations.
  • Familiarity with Landau's "Quantum Mechanics" notation and terminology.
  • Knowledge of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its implications.
  • Basic grasp of Dirac's mechanics and its approach to quantum theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the commutator in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in depth, focusing on its mathematical formulation.
  • Review Landau's "Quantum Mechanics" for further clarification on operator notation.
  • Investigate Dirac's mechanics and its treatment of quantum variables and constants.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify complex concepts related to commutation and uncertainty principles.

Dale12
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
In $9 after (9.1) in Landau's book <quantum mechanics>,I read a notation under there about (9.2) that: when operation i(Hf-fH) translate to classical limit, the first order is zero,and the second order is h[H,f],why? I just can't understand why the first order is zero(because u could substite sth to it and so Hf-fH=0?),and how does the second order be h[H,f],is there anything like pq=h here? I read Dirac's mechanics once but he did not tell it more clearly how the i and h appear, and here I was amazed again.thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The notation (9.2) in Landau's quantum mechanics refers to the commutator of two operators, H and f. The commutator is defined as [H,f] = HF - fH, where H and f are operators and F is the function that they operate on. In the classical limit, where h (Planck's constant) goes to zero, the first order term in the commutator, i.e. HF, becomes negligible compared to the second order term, i.e. fH. This is because in the classical limit, the operators H and f become commuting variables, and their product is the same regardless of the order in which they are multiplied. This is why the first order term becomes zero.

The second order term, h[H,f], is related to the fundamental relationship between position and momentum in quantum mechanics, known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This principle states that the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. In other words, the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum must be greater than or equal to h/2. This is where the factor of h appears in the second order term, as it is related to the uncertainty in momentum.

In Dirac's mechanics, he also uses the notation of the commutator to describe the fundamental relationship between position and momentum. However, he does not explicitly mention the factor of h, as he uses a different set of units that absorb this factor. But the concept remains the same.

I hope this helps to clarify the notation and the appearance of i and h in Landau's quantum mechanics. It is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and can be difficult to grasp at first, but with practice and further study, it will become clearer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K