How fast can a rigid diak spin without disintegrated?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sammywu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability and potential disintegration of a rigid disk when spun at high speeds. Participants explore the forces acting on the atoms within the disk, the implications of rotational motion, and the risks associated with high rotational velocities in practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the atoms at the edge of a spinning disk experience linear motion due to inertia, requiring centripetal forces to keep them in place.
  • Others argue that the forces acting on atomic bonds are influenced by the mass of adjacent atoms, complicating the understanding of when disintegration might occur.
  • A participant suggests that a minimization problem could be formulated to analyze the energy dynamics and potential breaking points within the disk structure.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of high rotational speeds, citing examples of injuries and accidents caused by disintegrating components in tools and machinery.
  • One participant notes that certain materials may not withstand high speeds, although it remains unclear if any material is immune to disintegration under practical conditions.
  • Historical examples are provided to illustrate the risks associated with high RPMs, emphasizing the importance of caution when working with spinning objects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanics of spinning disks and the conditions under which disintegration may occur. There is no consensus on the specific limits of rotational speed or the materials that can withstand such forces without breaking.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of atomic interactions under rotational forces, the dependence on material properties, and the unresolved nature of the mathematical models proposed for analyzing stress and strain within the disk.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying material science, mechanical engineering, or safety in high-speed machinery applications.

Sammywu
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Did anyone think of or have answered this question?

When we spin a rigid metal disk, shouldn't the atom at the edge of the disk tends to fly away in a linear motion?

The solid atomic structure must act as a centripetle force to keep the atom in place.

If we keep spining the disk, will the disk eventually disintegrate, because the atomic force is no longer greate enough to keep it in one piece?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is more to it than that. True, the atom at the edge experiences the greatest acceleration, but the only mass pulling at the bond is the mass of that atom. The atom just inside of that one has it's own mass, and the mass of the atom to the outside experiencing essentially that same acceleration. So, the bond holding this atom to the disk experiences roughly twice the force. This is even further complicated by the 3 dimensional nature of the structure.

You could probably work out a minimization problem based upon a total energy comprised of rotational kinetic energy, and potential energy due to compressive strain along the axis of rotation and expansion in the plane of rotation. The compressions and expansions at each point in the disk could be solved for as a function of rotational velocity. If the strains at any point indicate a breaking of the lattice, the disk will disintegrate at that point. Whether that point is at the edge, the center or in between is not obvious to me. My guess is somewhere in between.

Njorl
 
Agreed.
I would also like to offer a word of caution.
Rotational forces and the potential for fragmentation is nothing to mess with, without a full understanding of what is going on.
Take a simple Dremel tool for example, which has rotational speeds of 20-30,000 rpm's and above(depending on model) A 1-inch disk especially designed to work with the Dremel tool requires care but not paranoid caution. However, attempting to rotate a 6-inch pencil or other non-approved attachement at high speeds can cause serious injury, possibly death, due to fragmentation from bond-breaking, as the stresses created on a larger diameter "attachment" are very, very high.
 
Cool, let's try that pencil thingy you were talking about. Or we could suggest they do it on that show jacka$$.
 
FYI, computer cd-roms are limited in speed by this very issue. Some of the faster ones have had issues with cd's shattering due to the internal forces on the cd.
 
Originally posted by Sammywu
Did anyone think of or have answered this question?

When we spin a rigid metal disk, shouldn't the atom at the edge of the disk tends to fly away in a linear motion?

yes because of inertia

The solid atomic structure must act as a centripetle force to keep the atom in place.

If we keep spining the disk, will the disk eventually disintegrate, because the atomic force is no longer greate enough to keep it in one piece?


If you spin anything fast enough, it will disintegrate. Whether there is some kind of material that cannot be spun fast enough by any practical means, I do not know.
 
In the 1950s many drag racers suffered foot and leg injuries caused by clutches and flywheels disintegrating at high rpms. In the 1970s at a tractor pull, a man in the audience was killed by a piece of a water pump, in Denver as I recall.
Sometimes a water drip is used for cooling on a grinding wheel. It is important not to run the drip until after the wheel is turned on. Some wheels can absorb a lot of water, and will come apart.
Please be careful around anything that spins at high rpms, especially if it is made of a material that is brittle or there is any chance of it being out of balance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
90
Views
14K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K