Solving Electric Potential & Field of Continuous Charge Rod: Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter oooride
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Continuous
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a continuous charge distribution along a rod, specifically focusing on calculating the charge, electric potential, and electric field at a given point. The subject area includes concepts from electrostatics and integration techniques related to charge density.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of charge density to find the total charge on the rod and question the correct approach to calculating electric potential and electric field at the origin. There are considerations about using Gauss's law and the implications of the rod's position relative to the origin.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the integration process and the correct formulas to use for calculating electric potential and electric field. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the implications of the origin's involvement, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for clarity regarding the units of charge density and the y-location of the rod, which are not explicitly stated in the original problem. This highlights potential assumptions that may affect the calculations.

oooride
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
A rod with a continuous charge extending from x=2.00m to x=3.00m has a charge density lambda=3x^2.

a.)What is the charge on the rod?
b.)What is the Electric potential of the rod at the origin?
c.)What is the Electric field at the origin.


This was a test question that I totally messed up...

How do I find the charge of the rod? Everything I did wrong stemmed off that first part of the question.

For part a I totally messed up, I'm sure it was extremely easy, but I ended up integrating from 2 to 3 dq/r^2 only to realize with no time left that I'm finding the E field of rod, not the charge...[b(] Thinking about it now, should I have treated it as a guassian surface and found the charge by q_in / epsilon knot ?


When finding the electric potential I used V = Kq/r because I figured since it was the origin it was defined as V=0 and R_a = infinity.

When finding the E field at the origin I again treated the origin as a point and used E = kq/r^2 but then after the test realized I probably should have used E=int Kdq/r^2 and integrated from 0 to 3..
Should I of?

Any help is greatly appreciated
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful with units. You really need to mention what units the charge density is given in. I'll assume C/m.

a)[tex]Q = \int_a^b \lambda\,dx = \int_2^3 3x^2\,dx[/tex]

b)[tex]V = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_a^b \frac{\lambda}{r}\,dx = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_2^3 \frac{3x^2}{x}\,dx[/tex]

you really should have stated the y-location of the rod. I took it to be 0.

c)[tex]E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_a^b \frac{\lambda}{r^2}\,dx = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_2^3 \frac{3x^2}{x^2}\,dx[/tex]
obviously in the -x direction.

cookiemonster
 
Originally posted by oooride
How do I find the charge of the rod? Everything I did wrong stemmed off that first part of the question.
By integrating the charge density (λ= 3x^2) over the interval x = (2,3).
... Thinking about it now, should I have treated it as a guassian surface and found the charge by q_in / epsilon knot ?
Gauss's law won't help.
When finding the electric potential I used V = Kq/r because I figured since it was the origin it was defined as V=0 and R_a = infinity.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. V = kq/r is the standard form for the potential at distance "r" from the charge "q". (Yes, that defines the potential as zero at r = infinity.) So if you integrated kq/x over the interval x = (2,3), where q = λdx, you got it.
When finding the E field at the origin I again treated the origin as a point and used E = kq/r^2 but then after the test realized I probably should have used E=int Kdq/r^2 and integrated from 0 to 3..
Should I of?
You should have integrated kq/x^2, where q = λdx, but over the interval x = (2,3), not (0,3). There is no charge in the interval x = (0,2), so what would you be integrating?

Edit: Hey, cookiemonster beat me to it!
 
Last edited:
I know I always just wanted to see the math after a test, so I kind of forewent the explanations. Guess now he's got both!

cookiemonster
 
Originally posted by cookiemonster
I know I always just wanted to see the math after a test, so I kind of forewent the explanations. Guess now he's got both!
And I was too lazy to write the equations properly using Latex like you did. We make a good tag team.
 
Hmmm, well it looks like I got it wrong, which isn't good on a three question test.

Yeah I understand what was done, but got confused when it said the origin was involved.

Thanks for all the help.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K