Thread Closed

Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons

 
Share Thread
Feb20-07, 11:28 PM   #1
 

Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Consider two noninteracting particles p and q each with mass m in a cubical box od size a. Assume the energy of the particles is

[tex] E = \frac{3 \hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2} + \frac{6\hbar^2 pi^2}{2ma^2} [/tex]

Using the eigenfunctions
[tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} (x_{p},y_{p},z_{p}) [/tex]
and
[tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} (x_{q},y_{q},z_{q}) [/tex]

write down the two particle wave functions which could describe the system when the particles are
a) distinguishable, spinless bosons
b) identical, spinless bosons
c) identical spin-half fermions in a symmetric spin state
d) identical spin half fermions in an antisymmetric spin state

2. Relevant equations
For a cube the wavefunction is given by

[tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} = N \sin\left(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{a}\right)\sin\left(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{a}\right)\sin\left(\frac{n_{z}\pi z}{a}\right) [/tex]

[tex] E = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2} (n_{x}^2 + n_{y}^2 +n_{z}^2) [/tex]

3. The attempt at a solution
for the fermions the wavefunction mus be antisymmetric under exhange
c) [tex] \Phi^{(A)}(p,q) = \psi^{(A)} (r_{p},r_{q}) \chi^{(S)}_{S,M_{s}}(p,q) [/tex]
where chi is the spin state

so since the energy is 3 E0 for the first particle there possible value nx,ny,nz are n=(1,1,1) and the second particle n'=(1,1,2).

we could select
[tex] \Psi^{(A)} (x_{p},x_{q},t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\psi_{n}(x_{p})\psi_{n'}(x_{q} - \psi_{n}(x_{q})\psi_{n'}(x_{p}) \exp[-\frac{i(E_{n} + E_{n'})t}{\hbar} [/tex]
A means it is unsymmetric
the spin state chi could be
[tex] \chi^{(S)}_{1,1}(p,q) = \chi_{+}(p) \chi_{-}(q) [/tex]
S means it is symmetric

For d it is similar but switched around

for a) and b) i have doubts though
For a) the bosons must be distinguishable so we could have WF like this

[tex] \Psi_{1} (r_{p},r_{q},t) = \psi_{n}(r_{p})\psi_{n'}(r_{q}) \exp[-\frac{i(E_{n} + E_{n'})t}{\hbar} [/tex]
for one of the particles. Under exchange this would be symmetric.

b) if the bosons are identical then we simply have to construct a wavefunction that is smmetric like we did in part c for the fermions.

Is this right? Please help!

thanks for any and all help!
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Feb21-07, 04:41 PM   #2
 
bump
Feb21-07, 04:48 PM   #3
 
by the way [tex] \chi= \chi_{S,M_{S}} [/tex]

and
[tex] \chi_{+} [/tex] when Ms = +1/2
and
[tex] \chi_{-} [/tex] when Ms = -1/2
Feb23-07, 01:36 AM   #4
 
Mentor

Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons


Hi stunner5000pt,

I'm just learning this stuff myself, but I'll try to help. Your answer to part c looks correct. The spatial part of the wf was chosen to be antisymmetric, since the spin state is given to be symmetric, so that the *overall* wf is antisymmetric.

Quote by stunner5000pt View Post
for a) and b) i have doubts though
For a) the bosons must be distinguishable so we could have WF like this

[tex] \Psi_{1} (r_{p},r_{q},t) = \psi_{n}(r_{p})\psi_{n'}(r_{q}) \exp[-\frac{i(E_{n} + E_{n'})t}{\hbar} [/tex]
for one of the particles. Under exchange this would be symmetric.
No it wouldn't be! But that's okay! Because the particles are meant to be distinguishable. So I think your answer is correct...an acceptable wavefunction for a two-particle system is the product of the individual one-particle wavefunctions, *if* you know that one is in the state n, and
the other in the state n', because you are able to tell the difference between them.

Quote by stunner5000pt View Post
b) if the bosons are identical then we simply have to construct a wavefunction that is smmetric like we did in part c for the fermions.
Yes, you do have to construct a wavefunction that is symmetric. But no, it's not like part c, because in part c, you constructed a wf that was antisymmetric. Not only that, but your bosons are spinless, so you'd only have a spatial part to your wavefunction, and it would have to be symmetric on its own.

Hope this helps
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons
Thread Forum Replies
Difference between Fermions and Bosons in Feynman diagrams Quantum Physics 5
the difference between BOSONS and FERMIONS Quantum Physics 3
Bosons, Fermions and ?? Quantum Physics 3
pauli exclusion principle, fermions, bosons Quantum Physics 8
Normal ordering for bosons vs fermions General Physics 3