| Thread Closed |
Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons |
Share Thread |
| Feb20-07, 11:28 PM | #1 |
|
|
Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Consider two noninteracting particles p and q each with mass m in a cubical box od size a. Assume the energy of the particles is [tex] E = \frac{3 \hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2} + \frac{6\hbar^2 pi^2}{2ma^2} [/tex] Using the eigenfunctions [tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} (x_{p},y_{p},z_{p}) [/tex] and [tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} (x_{q},y_{q},z_{q}) [/tex] write down the two particle wave functions which could describe the system when the particles are a) distinguishable, spinless bosons b) identical, spinless bosons c) identical spin-half fermions in a symmetric spin state d) identical spin half fermions in an antisymmetric spin state 2. Relevant equations For a cube the wavefunction is given by [tex] \psi_{n_{x},n_{y},n_{z}} = N \sin\left(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{a}\right)\sin\left(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{a}\right)\sin\left(\frac{n_{z}\pi z}{a}\right) [/tex] [tex] E = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2} (n_{x}^2 + n_{y}^2 +n_{z}^2) [/tex] 3. The attempt at a solution for the fermions the wavefunction mus be antisymmetric under exhange c) [tex] \Phi^{(A)}(p,q) = \psi^{(A)} (r_{p},r_{q}) \chi^{(S)}_{S,M_{s}}(p,q) [/tex] where chi is the spin state so since the energy is 3 E0 for the first particle there possible value nx,ny,nz are n=(1,1,1) and the second particle n'=(1,1,2). we could select [tex] \Psi^{(A)} (x_{p},x_{q},t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\psi_{n}(x_{p})\psi_{n'}(x_{q} - \psi_{n}(x_{q})\psi_{n'}(x_{p}) \exp[-\frac{i(E_{n} + E_{n'})t}{\hbar} [/tex] A means it is unsymmetric the spin state chi could be [tex] \chi^{(S)}_{1,1}(p,q) = \chi_{+}(p) \chi_{-}(q) [/tex] S means it is symmetric For d it is similar but switched around for a) and b) i have doubts though For a) the bosons must be distinguishable so we could have WF like this [tex] \Psi_{1} (r_{p},r_{q},t) = \psi_{n}(r_{p})\psi_{n'}(r_{q}) \exp[-\frac{i(E_{n} + E_{n'})t}{\hbar} [/tex] for one of the particles. Under exchange this would be symmetric. b) if the bosons are identical then we simply have to construct a wavefunction that is smmetric like we did in part c for the fermions. Is this right? Please help! thanks for any and all help! |
| Feb21-07, 04:41 PM | #2 |
|
|
bump
|
| Feb21-07, 04:48 PM | #3 |
|
|
by the way [tex] \chi= \chi_{S,M_{S}} [/tex]
and [tex] \chi_{+} [/tex] when Ms = +1/2 and [tex] \chi_{-} [/tex] when Ms = -1/2 |
| Feb23-07, 01:36 AM | #4 |
|
Mentor
|
Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons
Hi stunner5000pt,
I'm just learning this stuff myself, but I'll try to help. Your answer to part c looks correct. The spatial part of the wf was chosen to be antisymmetric, since the spin state is given to be symmetric, so that the *overall* wf is antisymmetric. Because the particles are meant to be distinguishable. So I think your answer is correct...an acceptable wavefunction for a two-particle system is the product of the individual one-particle wavefunctions, *if* you know that one is in the state n, and the other in the state n', because you are able to tell the difference between them. Not only that, but your bosons are spinless, so you'd only have a spatial part to your wavefunction, and it would have to be symmetric on its own.Hope this helps |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Wavefunctions of fermions and bosons
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Difference between Fermions and Bosons in Feynman diagrams | Quantum Physics | 5 | ||
| the difference between BOSONS and FERMIONS | Quantum Physics | 3 | ||
| Bosons, Fermions and ?? | Quantum Physics | 3 | ||
| pauli exclusion principle, fermions, bosons | Quantum Physics | 8 | ||
| Normal ordering for bosons vs fermions | General Physics | 3 | ||