The time expression of the matter-raditation equality era

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Time
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the time of the matter-radiation equality in cosmology, specifically relating it to redshift. The original poster has derived the redshift for this era and is attempting to express time in terms of redshift using the Friedmann equation, noting the transition from a radiation-dominated to a matter-dominated universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses deriving two relations between time and redshift for different eras and questions the use of the matter-dominated expression in a reference text. Other participants suggest that the reference may be calculating the age of the universe rather than the time from the Big Bang to equality, prompting further exploration of the context in the reference material.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the appropriateness of the equations used in the reference text and exploring the implications of different interpretations of time in relation to the matter-radiation equality. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in relating the equations to the specific era of interest.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the differences in page references and equations in the Kolb and Turner text, which may affect the understanding of the problem. The participants are also considering the implications of using the current Hubble rate in their calculations.

Magister
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

I am asked to find the time of the matter-radiation equality.
I have already find the red shift of this era, so I just need to find the expression of time in terms of red shift.
From the Friedmann equation I can derive 2 relations between time and the red shift, one to the matter dominated era and another to the radiation dominated era.
I suppose that I will have to use the second one because from the beginning until the equality of the densities it was a radiation dominated universe.
My problem is that I saw, in the Kolb and Turner book, that they use the matter dominated expression. What am I missing??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would guess that they are then computing the time between now and the equality time. But that's basically the age of the universe. The more interesting number would be time from big bang to equality time. Do you have a chapter page reference from Kolb and Turner?
 
The [itex]t_{eq}[/itex] is in page 89 (chapter 3.5) and the expression they use are in page 65 (chapter 3.2) (for [itex]\Omega_0 = 1[/itex]).
I understand why do you say that they must be computing the age from the equality time until now but the they get a [itex]t_{eq}=2.4 X 10^3[/itex] years so it must be from the Big Bang until the equility time...
Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited:
Ok, my page numbers are a little different, but the equation they refer to (3.45) looks to be a more exact expression, valid for both matter and radiation dominated periods. I think the reason for the matter dominated form in the approximate solution is because it's based on H_0, the current Hubble rate. So to project back to get temperature etc at equality time, it's appropriate to use the matter dominated form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
986
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K