Does the MBR display orbital motion relative to us?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for detecting orbital motion of the microwave background radiation (MBR) relative to observers on Earth. Participants explore concepts related to the movement of cosmic radiation, anisotropies, and the implications of redshift measurements in an expanding universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether movement of the MBR can be discerned perpendicular to its expansion.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about visualizing the concept of motion "perpendicular to its expansion," noting that cosmic radiation comes from all directions and mentioning redshift measurements from the COBE satellite.
  • A participant inquires about the possibility of detecting net rotation of the universe from our perspective.
  • Another participant suggests that if alien civilizations could provide data on anisotropies in the MBR, it might be possible to infer whether the universe is rotating, though the reference frame for such rotation remains ambiguous.
  • A further contribution raises the question of whether cosmologically correlated redshifts or anisotropies could indicate orbital motion, proposing that a more detailed breakdown of the question might be necessary for testing.
  • One participant mentions the need for comprehensive SDSS data to investigate large-scale variations and suggests looking for angular and distance/redshift variations, referencing a paper discussing constraints on cosmological parameters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the concepts discussed, with no consensus reached on whether the MBR displays orbital motion or how such motion could be detected.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the nature of cosmic radiation and the definitions of motion and rotation in cosmological contexts. The availability of data for testing hypotheses is also noted as a constraint.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Can we discern any movement by the microwave background perpendicular to its expansion?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I hope one of the experts here will weigh in on this.

I am probably not understanding your question properly. But the cosmic radiation comes to us from all directions in space, so I am not sure how to even visualize what you mean by "perpendicular to its expansion." There is a certain sense in which the Earth (and the Milky Way galaxy) can be said to be moving, since the radiation is somewhat less redshifted in a certain direction than in the opposite direction, as measured by the COBE satellite a few years back.
 
Let me put it this way, Janitor (he who guards the door): is there any net rotataton of the universe from our perspective?
 
Interesting thought!

If we were to receive cooperation from alien civilizations living way out in a variety of places in the visible universe, each of them sending us radio transmissions (in English!) telling us what their own COBE-style detectors find in the way of anisotropies in the radiation, would we be able to piece the data together in a way that leads us to believe that the universe as a whole is rotating? Is that sort of what you are talking about? (As to what it would be rotating with respect to, I'll leave that to philosophers. )
 
Good enough. I. e., can cosmologically correlated redshifts (or anisotropies) in an expanding universe infer orbital motion as well?
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Good enough. I. e., can cosmologically correlated redshifts (or anisotropies) in an expanding universe infer orbital motion as well?
You would probably need to break this down into a number of more tightly worded questions before it could, in principle, be amenable to testing.

Perhaps one way to approach this would be to ask what large scale variations there are in the SDSS data (you'll need just about the full SDSS dataset - not due for public release for several more years yet - because 2dF doesn't cover enough of the sky); you could look for both angular variations and distance/redshift ones.

Here's a paper, by Tegmark et al (including the SDSS consortium) which discusses some of the constraints on a range of cosmological parameters, from SDSS data and combined WMAP/SDSS data. The last sentence of the abstract: "Including tensors, running tilt, neutrino mass and equation of state in the list of free parameters, many constraints are still quite weak, but future cosmological measurements from SDSS and other sources should allow these to be substantially tightened."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K