Single slit momentum conserved ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum in the context of an electron passing through a single slit, particularly focusing on the implications of the uncertainty principle and the interaction between the electron and the slit. The conversation explores theoretical aspects related to quantum mechanics and the behavior of particles in such scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the deflection of an electron through a slit implies a change in momentum, questioning whether momentum is conserved in this process.
  • Another participant argues that the interaction with the slit acts as a position-measuring device, causing scattering and thus introducing additional momentum, which complicates the conservation of momentum.
  • A third participant emphasizes that the electron's definite position after passing through the slit means it cannot have a definite momentum, according to the uncertainty principle, which raises questions about how momentum conservation can be applied in this context.
  • This participant further asserts that since the electron is in a superposition of momentum states, the concept of momentum conservation does not apply meaningfully.
  • There is a reference to a derivation of interference effects in quantum mechanics that purportedly does not rely on wave properties, although the validity of this reference is later questioned by other participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the uncertainty principle for momentum conservation in this scenario. There is no consensus on whether momentum is conserved or how to interpret the interaction between the electron and the slit.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in discussing momentum conservation due to the electron's state of superposition and the nature of the interaction with the slit. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying classical concepts like momentum conservation in quantum contexts.

Palpatine
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
If you send an electron through a thin slit it defracts because of the uncertainty principle. But if it has a new velocity not parallel with the direction of travel it had when it entered the slit, then certainly momentum was not conserved.

Can someone please point out what is wrong with the above description.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Palpatine
If you send an electron through a thin slit it defracts because of the uncertainty principle. But if it has a new velocity not parallel with the direction of travel it had when it entered the slit, then certainly momentum was not conserved.

Can someone please point out what is wrong with the above description.

This is an excellent question, and if you're a physics student, it clearly shows that you are thinking along the way and not just absorbing things blindly. If you're not a physics student, nor a physicist, then you should be! :)

The "slit" here is equivalent to a position-measuring device. It means that the slit interacts with the electron. This interaction causes the "scattering" of the electron into various angle perpendicular to the orientation of the slit. So you can think of the extra momentum that the electron has as being due to this interaction.

A excellent derivation of interference effects in QM that really does not depend on "wave properties" of photons, electrons, etc is by T. Marchella Eur. J. Phys. v.23, p.617 (2002). There are no "wave-particle duality" in QM. It is described by ONE, SINGLE consistent theory. There are only wave-particle duality when we insist that things can only be one or the other, as in our classical world.

Zz.
 
the fact that the electron goes through the slit (which is at a defenite position (say x-position) along the screen containing the slit) means that the electron is in a state of defenite x-position
...therefore it is not in a state of defenite x-momentum, according to the uncertainity principle...

well, if the electron is not in a defenite state of x-momentum, how do you expect the x-momentum to be conserved?! ...for, what value of momentum would be conserved (if it is to be conserved), because the electron is in a superposition of momentum states and not in a defenite momentum state!

conservation of momentum does not make sense when you're not talking about a defenite momentum state!

the electron initially need not be in a state of defenite x-position...then it is said to be brought to the defenite x-position state through the interaction with the slit-walls...you may think of this interaction as force if you wish...and when a force is acting, momentum is not conserved, is it?

but the crux of the matter is that the electron is not in a defenite momentum state,to begin talking about momentum being conserved!

hope this clears up things.
 


Originally posted by ZapperZ
T. Marchella Eur. J. Phys. v.23, p.617 (2002)

This doesn't work. Could you check the reference?
 
Originally posted by Stingray
This doesn't work. Could you check the reference?

Sorry, I had typos there..

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0143-0807/23/6/303".

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K