| Thread Closed |
Cauchy-Riemann conditions |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar4-07, 02:22 PM | #1 |
|
|
Cauchy-Riemann conditions
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) are the real and imaginary parts, respectively, of an analytic function w(z). Assuming that the required derivatives exist, show that [tex]\bigtriangledown^2 u=\bigtriangledown^2 v=0[/tex] Solutions of Laplace's equation such as u(x,y) and v(x,y) are called harmonic functions. 2. Relevant equations Cauchy-Riemann conditions: [tex]\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}[/tex] [tex]\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}[/tex] 3. The attempt at a solution I expanded [tex]\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta u}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} + \frac{\delta u}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y}[/tex] and using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions I found [tex]\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}\frac{\delta v}{\delta y} + \frac{\delta v}{\delta x}\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}=\bigtriangledown^2 v[/tex] What I can't figure out how to do is prove that this is equal to zero. |
| Mar4-07, 02:38 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Your eqs. for del^2 are wrong.
[tex]\nabla^2 u=\partial_x\partial_x u+\partial_y\partial_y u.[/tex] |
| Mar4-07, 02:49 PM | #3 |
|
|
Dang, you're right. Can I dot it into an element of length like this?
[tex]\bigtriangledown^2 u \bullet d\vec{r}^2 = \frac{\delta}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} dx^2 + \frac{\delta}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} dy^2[/tex] |
| Mar4-07, 03:09 PM | #4 |
|
|
Cauchy-Riemann conditions
There is a hint in the problem that says I need to construct vectors normal to the curves [tex]u(x,y)=c_i[/tex] and [tex]v(x,y)=c_j[/tex]. Wow, I'm pretty lost.
|
| Mar4-07, 04:01 PM | #5 |
|
|
The Cauchy-Riemann equations are
[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/tex] [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/tex] which is what you have, allowing for your peculiar use of [itex]\delta[/itex] rather than [itex]\partial[/itex]! Now just do the obvious: differentiate both sides of the first equation with respect to x and differentiate both sides of the second equation with respect to y and compare them. Are you sure that the hint is for this particular problem? A normal vector to u(x,y)= c is [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}[/tex] and a normal vector to v(x,y)= c is [tex]\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\vec{j}[/tex]. Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, that second equation is [tex]-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{j}[/tex] which tells us the the two families of curves are orthogonal but that does not directly tell us about [itex]\nabla^2 u[/itex] and [itex]\nabla^2 v[/itex]. |
| Mar4-07, 04:31 PM | #6 |
|
|
Thanks for your reply.
There is a part b) to the problem, and it is this: b) Show that [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0[/tex] I solved it easily using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so I figured that the hint was for the first part. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Cauchy-Riemann conditions
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Cauchy-Riemann conditions proof | Calculus | 9 | ||
| Curl and Cauchy-Riemann Conditions problem | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| cauchy Riemann relations | Calculus | 10 | ||
| Cauchy-Riemann Equations | Calculus | 0 | ||
| Cauchy Riemann Conditions Question | Calculus | 1 | ||