Why are elementary particles point-like in spacetime?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenSwires
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Spacetime
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of elementary particles and their relationship to spacetime, exploring whether particles exist within spacetime or if they give rise to it. Participants examine concepts from quantum field theory (QFT) and string theory, addressing the implications of particles being point-like and the characteristics of energy in relation to spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that elementary particles and energy do not exist in spacetime but instead give rise to it, suggesting a fundamental relationship between particles and the structure of spacetime.
  • Others argue that particles are indivisible and should be described as points, with energy being a characteristic of these points relative to one another.
  • A participant notes the need for a proper description of points that does not rely on distance, as distance is seen as a product of the relationships between points.
  • Some contributions discuss the dual nature of energy and momentum as characteristics of points, contrasting with time and space as characteristics of intervals.
  • There is a suggestion that spacetime is created through the exchange of energy between points, which may explain phenomena such as gravity and the flow of time.
  • Questions are raised about where information regarding distance is stored, with references to QFT and string theory as potential frameworks for understanding this relationship.
  • A later reply introduces the idea that all points could exist on a single superstring, with relationship information encoded in the dimensions of the superstring, separate from spacetime dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on the fundamental nature of particles and spacetime. Multiple competing models, including QFT and string theory, are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of spacetime and particles, as well as unresolved mathematical implications regarding the nature of distance and energy relationships.

StephenSwires
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Elementary particles and energy must not exist in spacetime. They give rise to spacetime. That is why there is relativity and the uncertainty principle: why they are point particles without dimension in space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More or less this was the postulate of the first atomic theory. There are particles to divide -thus defining or creating- the vacuum, and there is vacuum to let the particles move. As the Yang/Ying symbol, they are complementary conceps.

The other alternative is to include the distance between the properties of a particle. This is the alternate way, string theory.
 
The elementary particles are not divisible or they would not be elementary. Also, they are better described as points.
Energy is a characteristic of points(relative to other points).
If the points with their energy give rise to spacetime then a proper description must include their relationships to surrounding points, but it would not be described by distance between them since the distance is a product or effect. The points must be properly described in a coordinate system different from the spacetime coordinate system.
 
Originally posted by StephenSwires
The elementary particles are not divisible or they would not be elementary.

A slight miscommunication here, I think. Arivero said there are particles to divide the vaccum, not just "particles to devide".
 
Yes, I have just learn -understood- that it is dangerous to abuse of the "-" sign.
 
Originally posted by StephenSwires

Energy is a characteristic of points(relative to other points).
If the points with their energy give rise to spacetime then a proper description must include their relationships to surrounding points, but it would not be described by distance between them since the distance is a product or effect. The points must be properly described in a coordinate system different from the spacetime coordinate system.

Energy and momentum are characteristic of points, time and space are characteristic of intervals. It is a dual construction. Fourier transform in one side, and Planck constant on another, control this duality.
 
Originally posted by StephenSwires
Elementary particles and energy must not exist in spacetime. They give rise to spacetime. That is why there is relativity and the uncertainty principle: why they are point particles without dimension in space.

That makes a whole lot of sense to me. Space and time are simply a product of relationships. Lee Smolin talks about this in his book "quantum gravity" where he mentions that a theory of everything needs to understand that space and time are not a back ground to the physical universe, but arise from it.
 
Originally posted by Mazuz
That makes a whole lot of sense to me. Space and time are simply a product of relationships. Lee Smolin talks about this in his book "quantum gravity" where he mentions that a theory of everything needs to understand that space and time are not a back ground to the physical universe, but arise from it.
My point exactly. This is very hard to keep straight in one's thinking.
Spacetime must be created by the points exchanging energy.
Spacetime varies according to the points and their energy therefore it makes perfect sense that gravity is a "warping" of spacetime by mass (points with energy).
This explains why time can only flow in one direction.
This also explains why time stops at the speed of light and why the speed of light cannot be exceeded (in spacetime).
 
Good points, but one must ask "where the information about distance is stored?". If in the link, we are on QFT realm, if in the particle, we are in the string realm.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by arivero
Good points, but one must ask "where the information about distance is stored?". If in the link, we are on QFT realm, if in the particle, we are in the string realm.
I believe it legitimizes an underlying theory such as string theory or QFT but needs to be kept clearly in mind while developing the theory. A ToE does not use spacetime dimensions to describe the fundamental theory because they arise from it. It doesn't matter how many dimensions are used because they do not need to be thought of as a continuation of or include spacetime dimensions.
Perhaps all points could be described as existing on a single superstring based upon a beginning point Alpha and an ending point Omega. All relationship information such as that giving rise to distance (there is no distance in the underlying coordinate system because that is spacetime information) would be in the dimensions of the superstring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K