Does Weight Change with Reference Frame? A Question Explored

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of weight change relative to different reference frames, particularly in the context of special relativity. It establishes that a body's weight can vary depending on whether the observer is stationary with the scale or moving with the object. The reading on a scale in an accelerating rocketship increases by a factor of gamma = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) when oriented perpendicular to the direction of acceleration. The discussion also introduces the concept of 4-force and 4-acceleration, which are essential for understanding relativistic force measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of 4-vectors
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic grasp of force and acceleration definitions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz transformation
  • Explore the concept of 4-force in detail, including its applications in relativistic physics
  • Investigate the relationship between 3-force and 4-force in various reference frames
  • Examine practical examples of weight measurement in non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of reference frames on physical measurements.

lightarrow
Messages
1,966
Reaction score
64
Sorry for the trivial (and certainly already covered) question.
Does a body's weight change with the ref. frame? If I had a very long scale on which the body can move without friction, would I observe the scale to sign different values according if I am stationary with the scale or with the object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, yes. If you assume that the scale is in an accelerating rocketship (to provide the acceleration needed to impart weight) the reading on the scale (assumed to be oriented so the pans are perpendicular to the direction of acceleration) will increase by a factor of gamma = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

Note that if the scale isn't oriented perpendicular to the direction of acceleration, the problem becomes a lot more complex.
 
pervect said:
Basically, yes. If you assume that the scale is in an accelerating rocketship (to provide the acceleration needed to impart weight) the reading on the scale (assumed to be oriented so the pans are perpendicular to the direction of acceleration) will increase by a factor of gamma = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

Note that if the scale isn't oriented perpendicular to the direction of acceleration, the problem becomes a lot more complex.
First of all, thanks for the answer.
Can you explain how this is possible? Which is the meaning of "reading the body's weight on the scale" for any observer? Shouldn't it be independent of the fact the observer moves or not with respect to the body?
 
The scale has its own frame - the main point of interest is the force on the scale in its frame, but it is possible to define the notion of force relativistically for any observer.

Relativistically, this is most conveniently handled by the concept of a 4-force. If we assume our mass is pointlike (or at least very small), we can find the 4-force by multiplying the mass m of our weight by the 4-acceleration.

The 4-acceleration is just the rate of change of the 4-velocity with respect to proper time.

See for instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity#Force

Another way of saying this - the three-force is the rate of change of the momentum of the mass m with respect to coordinate time. The four-force is the rate of change of the energy-momentum 4-vector with respect to proper time. So the 4-force has one additional component (the rate of change of energy with respect to proper time), and is computed with respect to proper time rather than coordinate time.

The reason to use 4-forces rather than 3-forces is that they transform via the Lorentz transform. In fact, this is a property of any of the various 4-vectors that I've mentioned - all 4 vectors transform in an identical manner (that's their defining characteristic) - i.e. they transform via the Lorentz transform.
 
Thank you very much.
lightarrow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K