| Thread Closed |
Black hole entropy as a Noether Charge |
Share Thread |
| Mar28-07, 06:04 AM | #1 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Black hole entropy as a Noether Charge
Hi folks, I have a question about a paper by Thomas Mohaupt, called
"Black hole entropy, special geometry and strings". It's available here: http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?for...p-th%2F0007195 My question concerns part 2.2.5 , page 18. I find it quite difficult to get a nice feeling for doing calculations like the ones in that part. Here the author defines entropy as a surface charge ( a method due to Wald ). He assumes that the Lagrangian depends on the Riemanntensor, the energy-momentum (E-M) tensor and the derivative of the E-M tensor ( the covariant, I presume? ). He then considers a variation of the E-M tensor and the metric, which I do understand ( they're defined via a general coordinate transformation, so you end up with a Lie-derivative ) So up to that it's okay. First, I want to do the variation of the Lagrangian with respect to the Riemanntensor, and here I get some troubles. How do I write down such a variation ? It looks like [tex] \delta S = \frac{\partial L }{\partial R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} } \delta R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} [/tex] Here L is the Lagrangian density. If I want to rewrite this in terms of the variation with respect to the metric, can I use the usual chain rules for differentiation? Or should I do the differentiation explicitly with respect to the metric, and rewrite this in terms of the Riemanntensor? Then they define a current J. Via Noethers theorem I know that one can define such a current as [tex] J^{\mu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi ,\mu} \delta \phi [/tex] where we sum over all fields phi. So my guess would be that the current which is written down there in section 2.2.5 is acquired via [tex] J^{\mu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial R_{\nu\lambda\rho\sigma},\mu} \delta R_{\nu\lambda\rho\sigma} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \psi_{\nu\lambda},\mu} \delta \psi_{\nu\lambda} [/tex] Is this going into the right direction? In the variation of the metric and the E-M tensor they use a test function epsilon which is a function of the coordinates, but I don't see it in the current back. That's strange, because you can't divide the function out of the current ( we get derivatices of the test function ). Or can we put those terms to 0? Also I have some doubts about when to use partial derivatives in such calculations, and when to use covariant derivatives. Should I just replace al partial derivatives in such calculations by covariant derivatives? And does any-one know a good text(book) in which all this is nicely explained? I've been searching on the internet, but without good results. A lot of questions, I hope some-one can help me. Many thanks in forward, Haushofer. |
| Apr2-07, 10:11 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Nobody ? :(
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Black hole entropy as a Noether Charge
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Black Hole Temperature and Entropy | Astrophysics | 5 | ||
| Does a black hole have entropy? | General Astronomy | 3 | ||
| entropy of a black hole | Special & General Relativity | 2 | ||
| black hole entropy | Special & General Relativity | 0 | ||
| Black hole entropy and the log of the golden mean | General Physics | 1 | ||