Building Circuit w/ 2N3904 Transistor: Can I Use NPN from Science Kit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter david90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transistor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around building a circuit that utilizes a 2N3904 transistor, exploring whether a generic NPN transistor from a science kit can be used as a substitute. Participants also troubleshoot issues related to circuit functionality, component values, and tuning stability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires if any NPN transistor can replace the 2N3904, suggesting that it is a common transistor that might be substituted with others like the 2N2222, provided certain electrical limits are not exceeded.
  • Another participant mentions that they have a 2N2222 in their kit, indicating its availability.
  • A participant expresses frustration after their circuit did not work and questions whether using a condenser microphone instead of an electret microphone would make a difference.
  • Concerns are raised about the value of a capacitor (C5) used in the circuit, with one participant suggesting that the wrong value could be a reason for the circuit's failure.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the capacitor's value, with one participant clarifying that a value of .473 likely indicates 47,000 picofarads, which is significantly different from the required 4.7 picofarads.
  • Another participant shares their experience of successfully using a 2N3904 and a 5pF capacitor but notes issues with tuning stability and range, questioning how to improve these aspects.
  • One participant warns that generating a stable signal at high frequencies is challenging and critiques the circuit design, suggesting it has flaws that affect its functionality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the circuit's design and functionality. While some offer suggestions for troubleshooting, others critique the overall design, indicating that there is no consensus on the effectiveness of the circuit as built.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific component values and their implications, but there is uncertainty regarding the correct values and configurations needed for the circuit to function properly. The discussion also highlights potential misunderstandings about component types and their characteristics.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electronics, circuit building, and troubleshooting, particularly those working with NPN transistors and RF circuits.

david90
Messages
311
Reaction score
2
I want to build this circuit http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/fmt1.htm.

It requires transistor 2N3904. Is this any NPN transistor or do I have to get a specific one? I have some transistor but it just labeled NPN (from science kit). Can I used that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I believe 2N3904 transistors can be found at radio shack. Your link does not work for me so I cannot tell you anything more specific. The 2N3904 is a VERY generic and common transistor. More than likely it could be substituted with about any NPN transistor as long as you don't exceed the maximum current and emitter base reverse breakdown voltage. A 2N2222 is a likely match if you cannot find the 3904.
 
You should have a 2N2222 in your kit, I know we do. :smile:

Averagesupernova: remove the dot at the end of the URL: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/fmt1.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who are you going to be spying on?
 
nobody:wink: . It is just good to make something other than blinking lights from the science kit. uh.:smile:
 
I wired up the circuit and it didn't work :(.

Would it make any different if I got a condenser microphone instead of an electret microphone?

As for the coil (L1), is it necessary to have a pencil in the coil?

For C5, I used a ceramic cap that has .473 on it. Could this be why it doesn't work?

I don't really know how this circuit works so my troubleshooting is sh**. I just follow direction.
 
Last edited:
Typically a condenser mic IS an electret mic. One of the problems is definitely that you have the wrong value for C5. It's value is supposed to be 4.7 picofarad. What you used I would guess would be either a .47 microfarad or a .047 microfarad. Are you sure there is a decimal point in front of the 473?

Usually, the 473 means this: a 4, then a 7, then 3 zeros. This is the value in picofarads. 47,000 pF, which is .047 uF. A LONG way from 4.7 pF.

You will also find that the placing of leads and there length will have a large factor on how this thing tunes. Just the placement of your hand when tuning the variable trimmer capacitor will change the tuning.

Good luck. You will need it. Trust me, I've been there.
 
yes there is a ".". It saids .473 on the Cap. So what is .473?

The period throws me off.

So as for the tunning, the lower the var. cap, the lower the freq. that is going to be broadcasted on FM radio?

What is the different between different types of NPN transistors? U know like 2n3906 and 2n2222 ...etc
 
Last edited:
I bought some 2n3904 and 5pf cap and installed it and it worked. The tunining is unstable though. I am able to tune it using radio that has a knob but not a digital one. why? Anyway, it is too unstable to be useful. It supposily have a range of 1/4 mile but it wasn't the case. Am i doing something worng? How do I make the tuning more stable and increase the range?
 
  • #10
I really don't want to tell you this, but it is not a surprise that it didn't work out for you. Generating a stable signal around 100 Mhz is no easy task. The circuit you built is full of design flaws. The first being that the antenna is directly coupled to the main oscillator. If you take some electronics classes you will find out about coupling and isolation. The oscillator is definitely NOT isolated from the antenna in this case. In my opinion about all this circuit does is show how a simple RF oscillator can be made. It is in no way useful on its own.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
68
Views
8K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K