Signal Transmission from Mars to Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the types of radio signals used for communication between Mars and Earth, specifically noting that NASA employs microwave C band and X band frequencies for this purpose. The uplink frequency is approximately 7.8 GHz, while the downlink is around 8.4 GHz, allowing for efficient transmission of data over vast distances. Microwaves are preferred due to their superior travel capabilities in space, lower power requirements, and higher data capacity compared to lower frequency bands. The modulation method likely used by NASA is Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM), which facilitates dense data transmission. Additionally, there is interest in building personal receivers to capture signals from Mars probes.
NeoScience
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When they say it takes about 5-6 mins to send radio signal back to earth, what kind radio signal are they talking about? Not FM/AM signal right?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm betting digital FM
 
Looks like the frequency is in the UHF range (the same frequency band as some tv stations and many other types of radio communications), and yes, I'd also guess that they are digital, frequency modulated.

Also, at its minimum, Mars is about 35 million miles (3 minutes) and at its maximum, it is about 220 million miles (19 minutes).
 
Last edited:
NASA uses microwave C band and X band frequencies to communicate with the probes. Uplink is in C band about in 7.8 GHz range, and downlink is 8.4 GHz.

Microwaves travel a lot better in space, require less power, and more data can be sent than on lower frequency bands.

I don't remember what modulation Nasa uses, but it's probably QAM because you can cram a lot of data.

If interested, you can build your own receiver to pick up signal from Mars probes, no kidding.

http://www.uhf-satcom.com/vex/

hope that helps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
waht said:
NASA uses microwave C band and X band frequencies to communicate with the probes. Uplink is in C band about in 7.8 GHz range, and downlink is 8.4 GHz.

Microwaves travel a lot better in space, require less power, and more data can be sent than on lower frequency bands.

I don't remember what modulation Nasa uses, but it's probably QAM because you can cram a lot of data.

If interested, you can build your own receiver to pick up signal from Mars probes, no kidding.

http://www.uhf-satcom.com/vex/

hope that helps

Wow cool contraptions. Thanks. I'm try to set one up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top