What if Coulomb's Law Used Different Constants for Quantum Forces?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores hypothetical modifications to Coulomb's Law, specifically considering alternative constants for quantum forces, such as inverse cube or inverse fourth power relationships. Participants examine the implications of these modifications on force relations at the quantum scale, including the behavior of coupling constants and the effects of distance on force interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if Coulomb's Law used constants like x q1 x q2 / r^3 or x q1 x q2 / r^4, it would alter the force relations on a quantum scale, raising questions about coupling constants.
  • Another participant provides historical context, noting that Coulomb's experimental work established the inverse square law for electric charges, which has been experimentally verified and is applied in quantum contexts, except at r=0 where renormalization is necessary.
  • The same participant mentions that in particle physics, the strong force behaves differently, being directly proportional to distance, and references concepts like asymptotic freedom and infrared slavery.
  • A different participant raises questions about the implications of renormalization at r=0 and the effects of photon and graviton emissions on the effective force acting on an electron, suggesting that Feynman diagrams would become complex with gravity included.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the details of quantum field theory and questions the existence of a 1s electron in a proton, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and uncertainties regarding the modifications to Coulomb's Law and their implications, with no consensus reached on the questions posed or the interpretations of quantum interactions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the implications of different force laws at the quantum level, particularly regarding the assumptions about coupling constants and the behavior of forces at r=0. The discussion also highlights potential misunderstandings about quantum states.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
If the classical attraction between two coulomb charges was
constant x q1 x q2 / r ^3 or another constant x q1 x q2/ r^4 instead of
k x q1 x q2 / r ^2 (perhaps the constants could still be the
same-though I doubt it)
what would be the force relations on a quantum scale using coupling
constants?
Also what are the force relations if the r terms are on the top line
so force increases with distance?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Terms and Conditions - Posting Style Guide - Posting FAQ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In 1785 memoir to the French Academy of Sciences, Charles Augustine Coulomb (1736-1806) presented his experimental apparatus called the torsion balance.

This device was used by Coulomb to determined that the force of attraction or repulsion of electric charges obeys the inverse square law.

[tex]F \propto \frac {1}{r^2}[/tex]

Later in 1798, Cavendish used a similar arrangement of the torsion balance to measure gravitational attractions of two masses quantifying Newton's (circa 1685) 114 years old law of universal gravitation.

The inverse square law was theoretically formulated by Newton but experimentally verified by Cavendish and earlier applied by Coulomb for electrostatic forces of charge particles.

Because of the uncontestable results of the experiments, it was never felt the need to check for inverse 3rd power or inverse 4th power law of the distance r.

Inverse square law is applied the same way in the quantum domain except when r=0. This is where the force becomes infinite and renormalization technique comes to the rescue.

In particle physics, the strong force seems to be directly proportional to the distance, r.

[tex]strong force \propto r[/tex]

This property of the strong force is partly describe by asymptotic freedom and infrared slavery.

Asymptotic freedom says that the force between the quarks gets weaker as the quarks come closer to each other.

Infrared slavery says that under normal conditions, the quarks can never get far from each other no matter how hard they try to separate by divorcing its partneship.
 
quantum field theory

When r=0 renormalization makes the force finite.
But what is the size of the bare charge at r= 0?
Also if a 1s electron in a proton emits a photon and absorbs it again later it reduces the effective force acting on it.How? what would be the effect if it emits a graviton too? Presumably the feynman diagrams get rather complicated if gravity is included.
 
I am not knowledgeable in the details of quantum field theory. I don't know the answers to your questions. I'm sorry that I cannot help you further.

I do seem to recall that there is no 1s electron in proton or maybe I misunderstand what you are getting at.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K