Solving Polynomial: p(x) = x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1 | Factorization

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter expscv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of the polynomial p(x) = x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1 and its relationship to the equation x^8 - 1 = 0. Participants explore methods for factorization and the implications of these equations in the context of algebraic manipulation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the solutions of p(x) = 0 are among the solutions of x^8 - 1 = 0.
  • Several participants inquire about the factorization of x^8 - 1, with varying degrees of confidence in their responses.
  • One participant suggests that p(x) can be factorized, although they express a lack of time to demonstrate it.
  • Another participant provides a method for factorizing x^8 - 1 using the difference of squares.
  • There is a suggestion to factor y^4 - 1 as (y-1)(1+y+y^2+y^3) and then substitute back to find the factorization in terms of x.
  • One participant presents a complete factorization of x^8 - 1 and relates it to p(x), indicating a potential factorization of p(x) as well.
  • Discussions arise regarding the notation of functions, with some participants expressing preferences for using f(x) over p(x) and debating the implications of using different labels for functions.
  • Some participants express confusion or challenge the idea that only f(x) should be used to denote functions.
  • There is mention of calculating the roots of x^8 - 1 to find solutions for p(x), indicating a more straightforward approach to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants show varying levels of agreement on the factorization methods for x^8 - 1 and p(x), with some asserting that it can be done easily while others express uncertainty. The discussion about function notation reveals differing opinions without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention limitations in time and resources for demonstrating factorization, which may affect the depth of the discussion. The debate over function notation highlights differing educational backgrounds and preferences, which may influence participants' perspectives.

expscv
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
if p(x ) = x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1

show that the solutions of the equation p(x ) = 0 are among the solutions of the equation x^8 - 1 = 0

hence factorse p(x ) fully over R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you factorize x^8 - 1?
 
matt grime said:
Can you factorize x^8 - 1?

no, but you can factorise p(x ) = x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1.

although i have not got time and resources to do it, I am in a physics lesson.

and why do you use p(x)= ? i always thaught it was supposed to be f(x)=. although it doesn't matter
 
well, you can factorize x^8-1, and it's because you can do that easily that you can factorize p(x) {p is just a label, it doesn' mean anything, Rattis, if you were taught always to use f how did you cope if there was more than one object to label?}. You don't need any (extra special) resources, you can do it in your head.
 
matt grime said:
Can you factorize x^8 - 1?

yeah i think so x^8-1 = (x-1)(x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)

but it seems useless



and thanks chen that's a good way solve it, but i was asked to solve hence by x^8-1
 
You can factorize [tex]x^8 - 1[/tex] easily using [tex]a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)[/tex] repeatedly.
 
But you can factorize it more than that.

Hint

let y=x^2, factorize y^4 - 1 as (y-1)(1+y+y^2+y^3), which you know. now put the x back in, what do you get? This is just saying that 1 and -1 are roots of x^8-1, and we factor them out to get...
 
It's just:
[tex]x^8 - 1 = (x^4 - 1)(x^4 + 1) = (x^2 - 1)(x^2 + 1)(x^4 + 1) = 0[/tex]
And since p(x) can be factorized to:
[tex]p_{(x)} = x^6 + x^4 + x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)(x^4 + 1) = 0[/tex]
...
 
  • #10
wow surpised how came i never thinked abt that? ~~~
 
  • #11
matt grime said:
well, you can factorize x^8-1, and it's because you can do that easily that you can factorize p(x) {p is just a label, it doesn' mean anything, Rattis, if you were taught always to use f how did you cope if there was more than one object to label?}. You don't need any (extra special) resources, you can do it in your head.

resources as in time, and the fact that the teacher dosent notice me
 
  • #12
rattis said: and why do you use p(x)= ? i always thaught it was supposed to be f(x)=. although it doesn't matter
matt grime said:. . .p(x) {p is just a label, it doesn' mean anything, Rattis, if you were taught always to use f how did you cope if there was more than one object to label?}.
Actually, it is f(x), where f stands for function and the number inside your parenthesis (or x in this case) is the variable that the function is operating on.

Paden Roder
 
  • #13
PRodQuanta, are you saying that it's wrong to use other letters than f to indicate a function...?
 
  • #14
So, I've gto f(x) =sin(x), and I want another function to equal cos(x), and I must call that f as well must I?
 
  • #15
doesnt matter i guess, just incdicate group/function 01 =f(x) group/function 02 = g(x)
 
  • #16
PRodQuanta said:
Actually, it is f(x), where f stands for function and the number inside your parenthesis (or x in this case) is the variable that the function is operating on.
Can you please define the derivative of the product of two different functions using f(x) alone?
 
  • #17
Hey, that's just what I have been taught. It must be wrong then. Sorry.

Paden Roder
 
  • #18
Yeah, it's pretty wrong, considering there are functions like sin(x), det(A), log(x) and *gasp* [tex]\phi(n)[/tex]. ;)
 
  • #19
If you don't see the sneaky way to factor it, the most straightforward approach is to just compute the 8 roots of x8-1 and then plug them all into 1 + x2 + x4 + x6.
 
  • #20
Or sum a gp.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K