Find Net Magnetic Field & Direction - Quick Easy Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net magnetic field and its direction based on two magnetic fields that have been determined. Participants are exploring the appropriate methods for vector addition in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the idea of subtracting the smaller magnetic field from the larger one and question whether this is a valid approach. Others suggest using vector addition instead of a simple subtraction method, leading to confusion about the implications of vector properties.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct method for finding the net magnetic field, with some participants offering guidance on vector addition. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, particularly regarding the significance of the magnitudes of the magnetic fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of vector addition in the context of magnetic fields, indicating a potential gap in understanding how to apply these concepts correctly.

Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
alright... i just figured out two magnetic fields, and now the question is asking me to find out the net magnetic field and the direction, for the net i would just subtract the biggest from the smallest, and then i use the Right hand rule to figure out the direction of the B field... is this correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try vector addition, not a combination of vector addition and the cross product.

cookiemonster
 
so u mena like set the bigge one - the smaller one = 0?
 
It doesn't matter which one's bigger or smaller.

You are familiar with vector addition, correct?

[tex]\vec{v} = <v_x,v_y>[/tex]
[tex]\vec{v} + \vec{u} = <v_x,v_y> + <u_x,u_y> = <v_x + u_x,v_y + u_y>[/tex]

And bigger - smaller = 0 would imply that bigger = smaller, just for reference.

cookiemonster
 
Spectre32 said:
so u mena like set the bigge one - the smaller one = 0?


No, when he said "try vector addition", believe it or not, he actually meant "add". You already know the two fields separately- the "net" force field is exactly the same as the sum- if the two forces are in the same direction, then the "net" force is "larger" (in strength)- if they are in opposite directions, the sum is smaller (in strength). In any case, the vector properties will take care of that- just add the vectors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K