Is the Speed of Light Different in a Casimir Vacuum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ranyart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Propagation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the propagation speed of light in a Casimir vacuum, exploring the implications of modified vacuum states on the speed of light, particularly in the context of quantum field theory and special relativity. Participants examine theoretical aspects, potential experimental observations, and related concepts such as the Scharnhorst effect.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that modifying the ground state of the electromagnetic field in a Casimir vacuum could lead to a different propagation speed for light, potentially higher than the speed of light in a usual vacuum.
  • Others argue that the relationship between particles and waves in quantum field theory complicates the understanding of light propagation, suggesting that light behaves differently when considered as a wave in a modified vacuum.
  • A participant questions whether the modified vacuum between the Casimir plates maintains the same causality speed as in a usual vacuum, noting that the speed of light is a postulate based on observations in standard conditions.
  • Some mention the Scharnhorst effect, which suggests that light could travel faster than 'c' in a Casimir vacuum, although it is noted that this effect is extremely small and currently undetectable.
  • Another participant highlights the challenges in measuring the speed of light in the context of the Casimir experiment, citing the precision required for such measurements as a significant barrier to experimental validation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of the Casimir effect on the speed of light, with no consensus reached on whether light propagates differently in this context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the experimental verification of these ideas.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on theoretical assumptions about the nature of vacuum states and the challenges in achieving the precision necessary for experimental measurements in the Casimir setup.

ranyart
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
hellfire said:
May be this is just a trivial point: if one considers that light is propagating through a medium whose properties are determined by the ground state of the EM field, one should be able to derive a relation between this energetic state and c (or may be not?). Thus, if one modifies the ground state (as done in the Casimir experiment, where some excitation modes are suppressed due to geometric conditions), then the propagation speed should be different (higher, I suppose). I’ve never seen such a relation or derivation, and, if what I am writing is correct, I am not sure how it fits in SR.

Hellfire, you just going to make chroot :mad:

Whilst you queastion and reasonning are quite sound, the response by chroot is not so.

So let me elaborate on this:In quantum field theory, particles (and thus also photons) are excitations of fields. The the position is not a dinamical variable as such anymore, but just a label for each of the field excitations in space.

The QFT use's fields exitations, the old argument of 'when is a particle a wave?'..the answer in QM interpretations is whenever it is convienient.

But here is my answer and it will bare fruits later on, so the question again:'when is a particle a wave?'...the answer is when a 3-Dimensional particle is collapsed into a 2-Dimensional field. A wave is not 3-Dimensional, it may propergate across a 3-Dimensional space. A 3-Dimensional 'particle' cannot propergate in lesser dimensions and remain 'intact' as a geometric 3-D quantity.

Here you state:For example, how does light propagate in a Casimir vacuum? If different as in a usual vacuum, how does this fit with special relativity?

Take the QFT explanation you get the variable statement:You can determine c from two properties of the vacuum: the permeability and permittivity. I'm not sure what you mean by "Casimir vacuum."

The 'not sure' part is spread Universally across QFT.

Here is my answer, The initial set up of two 'perfect' plates which are brought to gether, expells 3-D matter from the surface's of the plates, this produces a surface tension, which is 2-Dimensional, and 'VACUUM' like conditions arise, (use of like is justified for simplicity).

Now the interesting thing is that the grip 'force' holding the plates together, creates a 2-D Attractive force within the two co-joined plates , the energy is then transformed through the plates and around, out onto the 3-D surface, which becomes visible as Casimir 'Radiation'. This radiation you have to understand is blue, and has been accelerated along the Surface Tension. This is very similar to the ultra-cold B-E-C condensates, which shows the miesner effect for superconductivity(you know where the liquid defies gravity and runs up the side of containers).

Now you seem to understand the Geometric conditions that are Dimensionally causing effects the at Quantum Scales, but let's consider the Macro scale.

Our Galaxy is 3-D matter, it is surrounded by a 2-D space.

The 2-Dimensional space(My correct term is Electromagnetic Vacuum) produces a Tension around our Galaxy, it envelopes the Milky way, whilst the 3-Dimensional matter contained in our Galxay offset this tension with a Photon Pressure (3-Dimensional outwrard pouring of light/particles), the only thing that can travel through the E-M-V is waves!

The configuration of 3-Dimensional Particles are collapsed through the Vacuum 2-D, until it meets the outward Photon pressure of another Galaxy 3-D, and so the energy of Macro 3-Dimensional matter can be seen to be traveling through a un-observed medium(2-D Vacuum) which contracts the Matter into waves, and then as it enters any Galaxy is 'expanded' or transformed back into visible and full 3-D energie's, Particles.


The corresponding transformations in SR, Lorentz Transformations..etc..etc are the Relative explinations.

But wait I hear you say..where are the Extra-Dimensional domains in current theories?..D-branes..the fifth-dimension..Higher dimensions of stringtheory?..

The truth is the Universe only needs a 2-Dimensional field for waves, and a separate 3-Dimensional Spacetime for Particles.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The answer to your question, is that when a 3-D Particle is collapsed through the Vacuum(2-D), it travels faster than 'c'. The reason for this, is that the particles become waves, and the waves travel faster, as they travel through a 2-Dimensional Medium.
 
I was questionning myself about the same topic. In the Casimir experiment, there is a cut off in the energy spectrum of virtual particles between the two plates. The difference of potential between and outside the plates generates the Casimir force perpendicular to plates.

Given the lower energy density of the vacuum between the plates compared to usual vacuum, one can ask whether this modified vacuum exhibits the same causality speed. The C value is a postulate that is based on observations on usual vacuum.

Have experiments been conducted to measure C between the Casimir plates?
 
I have seen this idea referred as the Scharnhorst effect. Apparently the effect is so small that it is undetectable.
 
pines-demon said:
I have seen this idea referred as the Scharnhorst effect. Apparently the effect is so small that it is undetectable.
In the meantime, i found this article detailing the extreme difficulty of a measurement of C on such a small distance (between the plates) of the Casimir experiment. Precision required on the tiny time measurement is not achievable within the current knowledge unless an alternative experimental setup is proposed.
http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~svozil/publ/1990-scharnhorst-j.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pines-demon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K