Do you think that scalar electromagnetic weapons are real and possible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of advanced technologies related to scalar electromagnetics, which some claim can unify gravity with other forces and potentially enable mind control or locate hidden objects underwater. References to government capabilities in detecting alien bases and using low-frequency waves to disorient individuals are made, raising skepticism about their validity. The concept of a unified theory of gravity is highlighted as a significant goal in physics, but many participants express doubt about the claims made in the articles, labeling them as pseudoscience or mere science fiction. The overall sentiment leans towards skepticism regarding the existence and application of such technologies.
Malakiem
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
www.totse.com/en/fringe/gravity_anti_gravity/162717.html

http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm

Hi all, does anyone think this is possible? Has anyone heard of it? I read that the government has the tech to find anything deep under water with advanced radar, including alien bases and other things under ground. In one of these articles, it even states that these weapons can be used in mind control. And can even make people disoriented with lower waves. Is it fact, or just another science fiction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the first paragraph of your first link
Scalar electromagnetics is an extension of present electromagnetics (EM) to include gravitation. That is, a unified electrogravitation, and, what is more important, it is a unified engineering theory. Its basis was discovered by Nikola Tesla. [cotinued]
http://www.totse.com/en/fringe/gravity_anti_gravity/162717.html

A theory that unifies gravity with the rest of the forces is the goal - the holy grail - of physics today, so this is clearly nonsense.

I wouldn't believe a word of it; not one word.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Back
Top