Calculating Center of Mass for a System of Spherical Masses on the x-axis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the center of mass for a system of three spherical masses positioned along the x-axis. The masses are specified as 5M at the origin, 2M at x = +12.0 units, and M at x = -8.0 units, with a rigid rod connecting them, which is assumed to have negligible mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate formula for calculating the center of mass and question the correct application of the values provided. There is a focus on ensuring all masses and their respective positions are accounted for in the calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the formula to use, while others are exploring the implications of unit systems and the correctness of the initial calculations. There is a lack of consensus on the final answer, with differing interpretations of the units involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the unit system being used, as well as a miscount of the number of masses in the initial equation setup.

psruler
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi, here is the problem:

Imagine three spherical masses all fixed on the x-axis: mass 5M at the origin, mass 2M at x =+12.0 units, and mass M at x = -8.0 units, all connected by a rigid rod whose mass can be ignored. At what position along the x-axis is the center of mass of the system located?

is this the correct equation? if so, i don't know where to plug in the numbers.
x = (m1x1 + m2x2)/ m1+m2

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.

Take a guess. You got 2 sets of values in the given and two sets of x and m in your equation. What makes sense?

cookiemonster
 
i got 2units as the answer. is that correct?
 
Oops.

You got 3 sets of values and 3 pairs of x and m. Your formula should be

[tex]\bar{x} = \frac{m_1x_1 + m_2x_2 + m_3x_3}{m_1 + m_2 + m_2}[/tex]

Sorry. I didn't catch that third value the first time.

2 "units" is not the correct answer. You should be getting something in units of meters.

cookiemonster
 
cookiemonster said:
2 "units" is not the correct answer. You should be getting something in units of meters.
Actually the answer is 2 "units". Where does it say we are working within the SI system, or any other unit system for that matter?
 
I could have sworn I read "meters" in that post last night! I must have been tired. =\

cookiemonster
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K