Register to reply 
Urysohn's lemma 
Share this thread: 
#1
Oct507, 12:08 AM

P: 1,996

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Urysohn's lemma My book says that the "if" part of Urysohn's lemma is obvious with no explanation. Can someone explain why? 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution 


#2
Oct507, 06:14 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,352

It would have been a good idea to actually state Urysohn's lemma as it is given in your book. Sometimes statements vary from one book to another. In particular you should note that Urysohn's lemma only applies in NORMAL spaces. What is the definition of a "Normal" topological space?



#3
Oct507, 11:53 PM

P: 1,996

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urysohns_lemma It comes down to whether the sets [0,1/2) and (1/2,1] are open. Apparently this is obvious to other people, but it seems counterintuitive to me because I thought open sets were open intervals. 


#4
Oct507, 11:56 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,092

Urysohn's lemma
[0, 1/2) is an open subset of [0, 1]. 


#5
Oct607, 12:14 AM

P: 1,996

I guess that makes sense, since balls around around 0 can have no negative numbers in them, so they are really just halfballs.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Borel lemma  Calculus  2  
Midframe Lemma?  Special & General Relativity  9  
Urysohn lemma?  Linear & Abstract Algebra  14  
Scharwz lemma  Calculus  4  
Konig Lemma  General Math  2 