| Thread Closed |
Space‐Based Solar Power |
Share Thread |
| Oct11-07, 06:40 AM | #1 |
|
|
Space‐Based Solar Power
Not sure where to put this, but the main scope is energy and that's physics.
Space‐Based*Solar*Power, As*an*Opportunity*for*Strategic*Security Looks like we may have solutions here. |
| Oct11-07, 07:56 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
At their estimate of $1-$2/kWh, it's a long way from feasible.
|
| Oct11-07, 08:09 AM | #3 |
|
|
Have they suggested how to get the energy generated back to earth?
|
| Dec12-08, 06:26 PM | #4 |
|
|
Space‐Based Solar Power
I had never consider SBS anywhere close to feasible, but with the publication of an article in the Economist special report I'm bringing this thread back to life.
The Economist Space solar power Let the sun shine in Essentially, the renewed interest is due to possible reductions in lift cost brought on by private enterprise, and a recent long distance microwave power transmission test. -History: First scientific footing by Peter Glaser (Authur D Little) 1968, building on the work of William Brown, Raytheon. Idea updated from time to time by NASA, Boeing, Lockheed, and the US DoD. -'No technical show stoppers' (?). Estimated cost now 50 cents/ kWh. -May 2008 Hawaiin Microwave test. A stunt. Wired. -Most likely design: Large space based geosynch. reflectors concentrate light on space based highly efficient PV (40%) which produce electricity, beamed to earth as microwave using solid state amplifiers. Large receiver on the ground - ~ sq kms. Power density on earth is not lethal. -Lift cost. Currently $6-10k per kg. Private launch people like Elon Musk believe they can do $3K. The NSSO (Andre's DoD link 1st post) report says $440/kg would enable 8-10 cent /kWh energy. Other PF threads: Space based power? '08 Solar Power Satellites '05 |
| Dec12-08, 07:04 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Dec12-08, 07:32 PM | #6 |
|
|
~Lyuokdea |
| Dec16-09, 10:43 PM | #7 |
|
|
So what would it take? Two cent power is a revenue stream of $160 per kW per year. Could pay back $1600 per kW in ten years. The main cost element, lift to GEO, has to be reduced by about 200 to one for power satellite to be worth doing. At 5kg/kW, and $100 per kg, that's about 1/3 of the allowable cost. So the problem has now been reduced to shipping a million tons per year to GEO at a cost of $100/kg. I don't think that can be done at all with chemical rockets all the way (the mass ratio kills you) but chemical to 5 or perhaps 8 km/sec and using ablation lasers for the rest of the delta V to GEO looks like it might do it. Google henson oil drum or ask me for a copy of Beamed Energy and the Economics of Space Based Solar Power. Keith Henson hkeithhenson at gmail dot com |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Space‐Based Solar Power
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| solar power maths | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Did PV solar power just become affordable? | General Discussion | 100 | ||
| lunar solar power | Current Events | 2 | ||
| solar power | General Engineering | 1 | ||