| Thread Closed |
Large Complete Ordered Fields |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct12-07, 12:37 AM | #1 |
|
|
Large Complete Ordered Fields
I was told that there are no complete ordered fields of cardinality greater than [tex]2^{\aleph_0}[/tex]. Why is that?
|
| Oct12-07, 01:33 AM | #2 |
|
|
i'm not 100% sure about this but..
I remember hearing a theorem that says that every ordered field with the least upper bound property is isomorphic to the reals. So every ordered field that is order-complete (ie has least upper bound property) has to have cardinality c. hmmm..i'm not sure order-complete and complete are always equivalent |
| Oct12-07, 04:57 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Let's think about it:
A field has to have 0 and 1, and hence all things of the form a/b for a,b sums of 1. This has cardinality at most |Q| the rationals, i.e. aleph_0. Now it has to be complete, so it must contain limits of all sequences of these elements. There are 2^\aleph_0 of these. The only question is now if there can be any other element. No there can't - if there were some element x I've not described, then I can assume it is positive by looking at -x if necessary, and if it's larger than 1, I can replace it with 1/x. Thus I have to show that any x such that 0<x<1 has already been described. But this is true, since I can construct a sequence of 'rationals' that approximate it by repeated bisection of the interval. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Large Complete Ordered Fields
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Complete ordered fields are Archimedean | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 9 | ||
| Solving large #s raised to a large # with the mod function | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 1 | ||
| Are all ordered fields dense? | General Math | 14 | ||
| Hilbert's 17th and uniquely ordered fields | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 0 | ||
| Ordered fields | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 0 | ||