Register to reply

QM simple harmonic oscillator

by ehrenfest
Tags: harmonic, oscillator, simple, solved
Share this thread:
ehrenfest
#1
Oct16-07, 07:25 PM
P: 1,996
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
If I have a particle in an SHO potential and an electric field, I can represent its potential as:

[tex] V(x) = 0.5 * m \omega^2 (x - \frac{qE}{mw^2})^2 - \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{qE}{\omega})^2 [/tex]

I know the solutions to the TISE:

[tex] -\hbar^2 /2m \frac{d^2 \psi}{ dx^2} + 0.5 m\omege^2 x^2\psi(x) = E\psi(x) [/tex] (*)

(Those are different Es)


So, I plug V(x) into the TISE and get:

[tex] -\hbar^2 /2m \frac{d^2 \psi}{ dx^2} + (0.5 * m \omega^2 (x - \frac{qE}{mw^2})^2 - \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{qE}{\omega})^2) \psi(x) = E\psi(x) [/tex]


Now, since we only shift and translated the potential, I should be able to find a substitution for x that yields the equation (*) in a new variable y = f(x), right?



The problem is, after I move the constant term to the RHS, I cannot find the right substitution. What am I doing wrong?

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
ehrenfest
#2
Oct16-07, 11:08 PM
P: 1,996
I think that I can even prove that there is no constant that you can add to x to find a suitable substitution. Something must be wrong here?
Gokul43201
#3
Oct17-07, 12:07 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Have you tried the obvious substitution: [itex]\xi = x-qE/m\omega ^2 ~[/itex] ?

You can ignore the additive constant and refer all energies relative to that value.

ehrenfest
#4
Oct17-07, 02:31 AM
P: 1,996
QM simple harmonic oscillator

Yes, I figured it out. The problem was that I was under the false impression that I had to substitute epsilon for every x in that equation, which does not work.

I realized, however, that you can substitute for psi(x) separately since it is a factor on both sides of the equation.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Simple Harmonic Oscillator Introductory Physics Homework 1
Simple Harmonic Oscillator Introductory Physics Homework 0
Perturbation of the simple harmonic oscillator Advanced Physics Homework 4
1-D simple harmonic oscillator Advanced Physics Homework 3
QM simple harmonic oscillator Advanced Physics Homework 0