Recent mass estimates for Milky and the Local Group

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Local Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent analysis of mass estimates for the Milky Way and the Local Group utilizes the Millennium Simulation, a comprehensive LambdaCDM model, to refine Timing Argument estimators. The study concludes that the true mass of the Local Group is approximately 5.27 x 1012 M, with a 95% confidence lower limit of 1.81 x 1012 M. The Milky Way's estimated virial mass is 2.43 x 1012 M, influenced by the observed recession velocity of the satellite Leo I. The findings highlight the complexities of estimating mass, particularly due to the dark matter halo surrounding these galaxies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LambdaCDM cosmology
  • Familiarity with Timing Argument mass estimation techniques
  • Knowledge of dark matter and its role in galaxy formation
  • Experience with computer simulations in astrophysics, specifically the Millennium Simulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Millennium Simulation and its implications for cosmology
  • Study the Timing Argument method for estimating galaxy masses
  • Explore the Gaia mission's contributions to precise mass measurements
  • Investigate the role of dark matter in galaxy dynamics and structure
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and cosmologists interested in galaxy mass estimation, dark matter research, and the dynamics of the Local Group will benefit from this discussion.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3740
Masses for the Local Group and the Milky Way
Yang-Shyang Li (1), Simon D. M. White (2) ((1) Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, (2) Max-Plank-Institut für Astrophysik)
10 pages, 5 figures, Submitted to MNRAS
(Submitted on 19 Oct 2007)

"We use the very large Millennium Simulation of the concordance LambdaCDM cosmogony to calibrate the bias and error distribution of Timing Argument estimators of the masses of the Local Group and of the Milky Way. From a large number of isolated spiral-spiral pairs similar to the Milky Way/Andromeda system, we find the interquartile range of the ratio of timing mass to true mass to be a factor of 1.8, while the 5% and 95% points of the distribution of this ratio are separated by a factor of 5.7. Here we define true mass as the sum of the 'virial' masses M_{200} of the two dominant galaxies. For current best values of the distance and approach velocity of Andromeda this leads to a median likelihood estimate of the true mass of the Local Group of 5.27\times 10^{12}M_\odot, or \log M_{LG}/M_\odot = 12.72, with an interquartile range of [12.58, 12.83] and a 5% to 95% range of [12.26, 13.01]. Thus a 95% lower confidence limit on the true mass of the Local Group is 1.81\times 10^{12}M_\odot. A timing estimate of the Milky Way's mass based on the large recession velocity observed for the distant satellite Leo I works equally well, although with larger systematic uncertainties. It gives an estimated virial mass for the Milky Way of 2.43 \times 10^{12}M_\odot with a 95% lower confidence limit of 0.80 \times 10^{12}M_\odot."some comments:
Simon White is a top astrophysicist
it isn't easy to estimate the mass of Milky including her dark matter halo
the method that they used to estimate the masses is very beautiful and unlike anything i ever saw before
it involves using a computer simulation (the Millennium simulation) in which 8 billion dark matter chunks (each weighing a billion solar) cruise around under the influence of gravity, inside a large cubic box.

The estimate of the local group mass (mainly the mass of Andromeda+Milky) is 5 trillion solar.
Milky is a little bit under half of that.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K