| New Reply |
Mass Spring Damper system with opposing springs |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct25-07, 04:53 PM | #1 |
|
|
Mass Spring Damper system with opposing springs
I'm sure I must be being a bit dim here, but I can't work this out!
I have a mass-spring-damper system, as shown in the attahed picture, in which i have a mass suspended between two springs and dampers, each of which are attached to a fixed surface. he two opposite surfaces are part of the same fixed mass (i.e. the whole thing is inside a rigid box). I know that a normal system with a single spring and damper can be expressed (in the Laplace domain) as k / (k + Cs + ms^2) But I can't work out how to modify the equation to include the mass and spring on the other side! Any advice would be most welcome! Thanks, Andrew |
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Oct25-07, 06:12 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
|
| Oct26-07, 12:55 AM | #3 |
|
|
Are they effectvely in series? If the mass is displaced, one of the springs tries to push it back into place, while the other one pulls it back in to place? Equally, when the mass is in motion, both the dampers resist the motion equally?
Does that mean the expression becomes [k1 + k2] = ([k1+k2s] + [C1+C2]s + ms^2) Or am I being stupid? |
| Oct26-07, 01:08 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Mass Spring Damper system with opposing springsBTW, although the springs look like they're in series, when one acts on either side of a mass, they actually behave like two springs side-by-side acting on one side of the mass, so they're properly speaking 'in parallel'. (Springs obey the same equivalent constant rules as capacitors and inductors do in electrical networks: for parallel components, individual constants add; for series components, reciprocals of the individual constants add to give the reciprocal of the equivalent constant.) |
| Oct26-07, 01:53 AM | #5 |
|
|
Excellent! Thank you very much for your help! And yes, I did mean [k1+k2].
Are the dampers comparable to Inductors and masses comparable to Resistors? Thanks again, Andrew |
| Feb1-11, 06:54 PM | #6 |
|
|
Hi dear andrwe
I have a project exactly same as yours. I am pleased if you send for me the differential equation that you found. you wrote [k1 + k2] = ([k1+k2s] + [C1+C2]s + ms^2) but I've understood why [k1+k2s] and why there is s near k2 Any advice would be most welcome! thank you noushin |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Mass Spring Damper system with opposing springs
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| mass-spring-damper system | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| need help with mass-spring-damper system | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| Wheel, spring and Damper System | Classical Physics | 0 | ||
| Multiple mass-spring-damper system | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||